Public COA audit

Tesamorelin

Audited July 28, 2026

Mostly consistent, with concerns

Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.

Legitimacy
72
Confidence
85%
Panels
4/7
Purity (printed)
99.62%

Document details

Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.

Batch / lot
TES10-062026-1
Identity method
LC-MS
Sample date
2026-06-11
Issue date
2026-06-15

7-panel checklist

Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

4 of 7 present · 4 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 3 missing

Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.

  • Identity

    Tested · passed · core

    Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).

    Tesamorelin

  • Purity

    Tested · passed · core

    Reported purity percentage for the analyte.

    99.62%

  • Heavy metals

    Not on this COA

    Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Microbial

    Tested · passed

    Bioburden / microbial limits testing.

    No Detectable Microbial DNA

  • Endotoxin

    Tested · passed · core

    LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.

    Pass (both replicates)

  • Sterility

    Not on this COA

    Sterility testing where applicable.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Residual solvent / water

    Not on this COA

    Residual solvents or water content limits.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

How to read this

Had data · good

Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).

Had data · bad

Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.

Had data · unclear

Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.

Missing

Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

Findings

Evidence-linked observations from this audit.

  • High purity confirmed

    HPLC-UV purity of 99.62% with individual vial measurements of 99.65% and 99.58%. This is normal for research-grade peptides.

  • Identity confirmed by LC-MS

    Tesamorelin identity confirmed via liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry with mass confirmation spectrum provided.

  • Comprehensive testing suite

    Document includes identity, purity, endotoxin, and microbial testing. Heavy metals, sterility, and residual solvent panels not present but this is common for peptide COAs.

  • Batch information present

    Lot number TES10-062026-1 clearly stated with accession number 2606110521 and search code.

  • Dates within normal range

    Received 2026-06-11, reported 2026-06-15 (4-day turnaround). Both dates are before today (2026-07-28).

  • Lab verification limited

    Freedom Diagnostics Testing appears to be a newer or smaller lab. Website and contact information provided but independent verification of accreditation/certification not visible on document.

  • Professional presentation

    Document includes chromatogram, mass spectrum, detailed methodology, appropriate disclaimers, and signature. Layout is consistent with legitimate testing reports.

  • Signature lacks credentials

    Document signed by 'Principal Chemist' but no name, credentials (PhD, MS), or certification numbers provided. Legitimate labs typically include chemist identification.

PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.