Public COA audit

Tesamorelin

Audited July 29, 2026

Mostly consistent, with concerns

Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.

Legitimacy
72
Confidence
83%
Panels
2/7
Purity (printed)
99.95%

Document details

Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.

Batch / lot
ah59t69
Identity method
HPLC-UV-MS
Sample date
2025-10-14
Issue date
2025-10-23

7-panel checklist

Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

2 of 7 present · 2 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 5 missing

Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.

  • Identity

    Tested · passed · core

    Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).

    ID Confirmed

  • Purity

    Tested · passed · core

    Reported purity percentage for the analyte.

    >99.95%

  • Heavy metals

    Not on this COA

    Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Microbial

    Not on this COA

    Bioburden / microbial limits testing.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Endotoxin

    Not on this COA · core

    LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Sterility

    Not on this COA

    Sterility testing where applicable.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Residual solvent / water

    Not on this COA

    Residual solvents or water content limits.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

How to read this

Had data · good

Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).

Had data · bad

Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.

Had data · unclear

Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.

Missing

Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

Findings

Evidence-linked observations from this audit.

  • Dual lab branding inconsistency

    Document shows both 'Finnrick Analytics' and 'Krause Analytical LLC' branding. Header says 'Finnrick.com' and 'Finnrick Analytics' but footer and signature reference 'Krause Analytical LLC'. This dual branding pattern could indicate a reseller/broker relationship or white-labeling arrangement, but creates ambiguity about the actual testing entity.

  • Inconsistent batch identifier format

    Sample identifier appears as both 'ah59t69' (page 1 header) and 'ah59t69' (consistent), but the Test Certificate ID is 'ah59t69' which matches. Lab number is '129652'. Multiple overlapping identifiers without clear explanation of their relationship.

  • High purity with supporting chromatogram

    Chromatographic purity >99.95% is supported by clean chromatogram showing single dominant peak at 6.38 minutes with minimal impurities. This level of purity is normal for research-grade peptides.

  • Mass spectrum confirmation provided

    Document includes mass spectrum comparison between sample (129652) and reference standard (Tesamorelin) showing matching fragmentation patterns with major ions at m/z 644 and 735, supporting identity confirmation.

  • Limited testing scope

    COA only includes identity and purity testing. No heavy metals, microbial, endotoxin, sterility, or residual solvent testing reported. This is common for basic peptide analysis but limits comprehensive quality assessment.

  • Reasonable timeline

    Sample received 2025-10-14, tested 2025-10-22, report issued 2025-10-23. This 9-day turnaround is reasonable for peptide analysis.

  • Large watermark obscures content

    Heavy 'FINNRICK' watermark across both pages makes some text difficult to read and appears unprofessional for an official analytical certificate.

PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.