Public COA audit
Tesamorelin
Audited July 29, 2026
Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.
- Legitimacy
- 92
- Confidence
- 93%
- Panels
- 3/7
- Purity (printed)
- 99.9%
Document details
Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.
- Batch / lot
- j7ptzkb
- Identity method
- HPLC-UV-MS
- Sample date
- 2026-01-16
- Issue date
- 2026-02-04
7-panel checklist
Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
3 of 7 present · 3 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 4 missing
Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.
Identity
Tested · passed · core
Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).
ID Confirmed
Purity
Tested · passed · core
Reported purity percentage for the analyte.
>99.9%
Heavy metals
Not on this COA
Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Microbial
Not on this COA
Bioburden / microbial limits testing.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Endotoxin
Tested · passed · core
LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.
<0.5 EU/vial
Sterility
Not on this COA
Sterility testing where applicable.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Residual solvent / water
Not on this COA
Residual solvents or water content limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
How to read this
Had data · good
Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).
Had data · bad
Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.
Had data · unclear
Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.
Missing
Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
Findings
Evidence-linked observations from this audit.
High chromatographic purity
Chromatographic purity >99.9% with clean chromatogram showing single dominant peak at retention time 5.57 minutes. This is normal for research-grade peptides.
Identity confirmed by mass spectrometry
Mass spectrum matches reference standard for Tesamorelin with characteristic m/z peaks at 644, 735, 858. CAS number 218949-48-5 provided.
Batch/lot number present
Batch/Lot j7ptzkb clearly stated and matches Test Certificate ID
Dates are logical and consistent
Sample received 2026-01-16, testing performed 2026-01-26 to 2026-02-01, report issued 2026-02-04. All dates are sequential and reasonable.
Testing lab identified
Krause Analytical LLC, 8127 Mesa Drive Suite B-206, Austin, TX 78759. Laboratory Director Mark C. Krause signature present.
Verification URL provided
Document includes verification URL https://finnrick.com/verify with certificate ID j7ptzkb
Endotoxin testing performed
Endotoxin levels <0.5 EU/vial by USP 86 method, within acceptable limits
Heavy metals method described but no results
Page 3 describes ICP-MS method for metals testing (USP/NF 233) but no results are reported in the certificate
Limited microbiology testing
Only endotoxin testing performed; no microbial contamination or sterility testing results provided
Professional formatting with supporting data
Document includes chromatogram, mass spectrum comparison, detailed methods summary, and proper COA structure across 3 pages
PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.