Public COA audit
Tesamorelin
Audited July 29, 2026
Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.
- Legitimacy
- 92
- Confidence
- 88%
- Panels
- 2/7
- Purity (printed)
- 99.9%
Document details
Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.
- Batch / lot
- 9s7kmnv
- Identity method
- HPLC-UV-MS
- Sample date
- 2026-04-10
- Issue date
- 2026-04-28
7-panel checklist
Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
2 of 7 present · 2 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 5 missing
Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.
Identity
Tested · passed · core
Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).
ID Confirmed
Purity
Tested · passed · core
Reported purity percentage for the analyte.
>99.9%
Heavy metals
Not on this COA
Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Microbial
Not on this COA
Bioburden / microbial limits testing.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Endotoxin
Not on this COA · core
LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Sterility
Not on this COA
Sterility testing where applicable.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Residual solvent / water
Not on this COA
Residual solvents or water content limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
How to read this
Had data · good
Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).
Had data · bad
Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.
Had data · unclear
Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.
Missing
Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
Findings
Evidence-linked observations from this audit.
High chromatographic purity
HPLC purity >99.9% is excellent and typical for research-grade peptides
Mass spectral confirmation
Identity confirmed by HPLC-UV-MS with mass spectrum provided on page 3
Batch/lot number present
Batch 9s7kmnv clearly stated
Dates within normal range
Sample received 2026-04-10, tested 2026-04-16, report issued 2026-04-28 - all reasonable and sequential
Established lab with verification URL
Krause Analytical LLC with Austin, TX address and verification URL provided
Limited testing panels
Only identity and purity panels performed; methods for endotoxin and heavy metals are described on page 4 but no results shown, suggesting these tests were not conducted for this sample
Professional presentation
Multi-page report with chromatogram, mass spectrum, methods summary, and signature from Laboratory Director Mark C. Krause
Label claim verification
Actual content 9.51 mg vs 10 mg label claim = 95.1% of label, within acceptable range
PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.