Public COA audit
Tesamorelin
Audited September 5, 2026
Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.
- Legitimacy
- 72
- Confidence
- 85%
- Panels
- 3/7
- Purity (printed)
- 99.81%
Scored moderately because the document is mostly consistent but carries soft concerns, limited panel coverage (3/7), 4 soft concerns, and notable note: "High HPLC purity". To improve: include identity, purity, and endotoxin at minimum.
Document details
Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.
- Batch / lot
- 8dpa32k
- Identity method
- HPLC-UV-MS
- Sample date
- 2026-02-26
- Issue date
- 2026-03-02
Original certificate
Embedded copy of the stored COA PDF or image. Download it for your records — PeptIQ’s audit is separate from the lab document itself.
7-panel checklist
Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
3 of 7 present · 2 passed · 0 failed · 1 reported · 4 missing
Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.
Identity
Tested · passed · core
Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).
ID Confirmed
Purity
Tested · passed · core
Reported purity percentage for the analyte.
99.81%
Heavy metals
Not on this certificate file
Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Microbial
Not on this certificate file
Bioburden / microbial limits testing.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Endotoxin
Tested · result on file · core
LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.
0.67 EU
Sterility
Not on this certificate file
Sterility testing where applicable.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Residual solvent / water
Not on this certificate file
Residual solvents or water content limits.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
How to read this
Had data · good
Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).
Had data · bad
Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.
Had data · unclear
Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.
Missing on this file
Not on this certificate file. Lowers file thoroughness; a sibling endotoxin/purity report for the same lot may still exist. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
Findings
Evidence-linked observations from this audit.
High HPLC purity
99.81% chromatographic purity is excellent and normal for research-grade peptides
Mass spectral confirmation
Identity confirmed by HPLC-UV-MS with reference spectrum match shown on page 2
Batch/lot number present
Lot 8dpa32k clearly stated with vial photos
Dates within normal range
Sample received 2/26/2026, report issued 3/2/2026 (4-day turnaround), endotoxin tested 2/28/2026
Lab name inconsistency
Document header shows 'Finnrick Analytics' and 'Finnrick.com' but footer and signature reference 'Krause Analytical LLC' with Austin, TX address. This dual branding is unusual but may indicate Finnrick is a reseller/distributor using Krause as contract lab.
Verification URL domain mismatch
Verification URL is https://finnrick.com/verify but lab performing analysis is Krause Analytical LLC. Cannot verify if this URL is functional or legitimate without external check.
Endotoxin testing present
Endotoxin result 0.67 EU reported using USP 86 (LAL method) on 2/28/2026
Heavy metals method described but no results
Page 3 describes ICP-MS method for metals (USP/NF 233) but no results are shown in the certificate. This may be a separate test not performed for this lot.
Missing microbial and sterility panels
No microbial contamination or sterility testing results shown. Common for research-grade peptides but limits quality assurance.
Professional presentation
Document includes chromatogram, mass spectrum comparison, detailed methods, signature, and vial photos. Formatting is consistent with legitimate analytical lab reports.
PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.