Public COA audit

Tesamorelin

Audited September 5, 2026

Mostly consistent, with concerns

Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.

Legitimacy
68
Confidence
82%
Panels
3/7
Purity (printed)
71.61%

Scored lower because the document is mostly consistent but carries soft concerns, limited panel coverage (3/7), 5 soft concerns, and notable note: "Low chromatographic purity". To improve: include identity, purity, and endotoxin at minimum.

Document details

Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.

Batch / lot
k6fsnyx
Identity method
HPLC-UV-MS
Sample date
2025-11-14
Issue date
2025-11-25

Original certificate

Embedded copy of the stored COA PDF or image. Download it for your records — PeptIQ’s audit is separate from the lab document itself.

Loading original certificate…

7-panel checklist

Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

3 of 7 present · 1 passed · 0 failed · 2 reported · 4 missing

Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.

  • Identity

    Tested · passed · core

    Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).

    ID Confirmed

  • Purity

    Tested · result on file · core

    Reported purity percentage for the analyte.

    71.61%

  • Heavy metals

    Not on this certificate file

    Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

  • Microbial

    Not on this certificate file

    Bioburden / microbial limits testing.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

  • Endotoxin

    Tested · result on file · core

    LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.

  • Sterility

    Not on this certificate file

    Sterility testing where applicable.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

  • Residual solvent / water

    Not on this certificate file

    Residual solvents or water content limits.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

How to read this

Had data · good

Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).

Had data · bad

Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.

Had data · unclear

Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.

Missing on this file

Not on this certificate file. Lowers file thoroughness; a sibling endotoxin/purity report for the same lot may still exist. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

Findings

Evidence-linked observations from this audit.

  • Low chromatographic purity

    71.61% purity is below typical research-grade peptide standards (usually ≥95%). This indicates significant impurities.

  • Low peptide mass recovery

    Total peptide mass is 3.80 mg in a 5 mg vial (76.1% of label claim), indicating underfill or degradation.

  • Identity confirmed

    Mass spectrum matches Tesamorelin reference standard with appropriate m/z peaks (644, 735).

  • Incomplete testing scope

    This report shows only purity/identity analysis. Methods summary describes endotoxin (LAL) and heavy metals (ICP-MS) testing procedures, but no results are provided in this document. This may be a purity-scoped report only.

  • Vendor/lab name inconsistency

    Document header shows 'Finnrick Analytics' and 'Finnrick.com' but footer and signature reference 'Krause Analytical LLC'. This dual branding suggests Finnrick may be a reseller/distributor using Krause as the testing lab.

  • Watermark and formatting anomalies

    Heavy 'FINNRICK' watermark throughout document and page numbering inconsistencies ('Page 1 of 23' vs 'Page 1 of 3') suggest possible template reuse or document assembly issues.

  • Batch/lot number present

    Lot number k6fsnyx is clearly stated and matches verification ID.

PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.