Public COA audit

Tesamorelin

Audited July 28, 2026

Mostly consistent, with concerns

Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.

Legitimacy
92
Confidence
88%
Panels
5/7
Purity (printed)
99.78%

Document details

Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.

Batch / lot
CR-TESA20-2606-GRAY
Identity method
HPLC-RTM (retention time match)
Sample date
2026-06-20
Issue date
2026-07-02

7-panel checklist

Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

5 of 7 present · 5 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 2 missing

Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.

  • Identity

    Tested · passed · core

    Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).

    Confirmed (Tesamorelin)

  • Purity

    Tested · passed · core

    Reported purity percentage for the analyte.

    99.78%

  • Heavy metals

    Tested · passed

    Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.

    As: 0.11 ppm, Cd: 0.109 ppm, Pb: 0.322 ppm, Hg: 0.437 ppm, Cr: 0.889 ppm

  • Microbial

    Not on this COA

    Bioburden / microbial limits testing.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Endotoxin

    Tested · passed · core

    LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.

    0.2 EU/mL

  • Sterility

    Tested · passed

    Sterility testing where applicable.

    No Growth

  • Residual solvent / water

    Not on this COA

    Residual solvents or water content limits.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

How to read this

Had data · good

Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).

Had data · bad

Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.

Had data · unclear

Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.

Missing

Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

Findings

Evidence-linked observations from this audit.

  • High purity confirmed

    99.78% purity by HPLC with conformity testing across 3 samples (mean 99.75%, std dev 0.0189%). This is normal for research-grade peptides.

  • Identity confirmed

    Tesamorelin confirmed by HPLC retention time match with reference standard. Includes fentanyl screen (not detected).

  • Batch information complete

    Lot CR-TESA20-2606-GRAY, COA #COA-2026-DH-89C, Accession #ACC-2026-5791

  • Dates consistent

    Received 2026-06-20, analyzed and issued 2026-07-02. All dates are valid and sequential.

  • Lab credentials present

    ILS Laboratories, San Diego CA. ISO/IEC 17025 accredited. Signed by Dr. Greg Kalyuzhny, Lab Director. Verification URL and QR code provided.

  • Comprehensive testing

    Five panels present: identity, purity, heavy metals, endotoxin, sterility. All passed. Microbial culture and residual solvents not tested (common for peptide COAs).

  • HPLC chromatogram included

    Representative chromatogram shown for Dedicated V0 sample (99.74% purity). Clean peak profile consistent with high-purity peptide.

  • Cannot independently verify lab

    ILS Laboratories is not widely known in public databases. Verification URL provided but cannot be tested in this audit context. This is noted but does not constitute evidence of fabrication.

PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.