Public COA audit

BPC-157 · TB-500

Audited July 29, 2026

Mostly consistent, with concerns

Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.

Legitimacy
68
Confidence
75%
Panels
1/7

Document details

Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.

Batch / lot
Test-ED7
Identity method
LCMS
Sample date
2026-06-05
Issue date
2026-06-17

7-panel checklist

Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

1 of 7 present · 1 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 6 missing

Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.

  • Identity

    Tested · passed · core

    Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).

    BPC-157, TB-500 (TB4), Mannitol identified

  • Purity

    Not on this COA · core

    Reported purity percentage for the analyte.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Heavy metals

    Not on this COA

    Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Microbial

    Not on this COA

    Bioburden / microbial limits testing.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Endotoxin

    Not on this COA · core

    LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Sterility

    Not on this COA

    Sterility testing where applicable.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Residual solvent / water

    Not on this COA

    Residual solvents or water content limits.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

How to read this

Had data · good

Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).

Had data · bad

Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.

Had data · unclear

Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.

Missing

Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

Findings

Evidence-linked observations from this audit.

  • Identity confirmation present

    LCMS analysis identified BPC-157, TB-500 (TB4), and mannitol. Mass spectra and chromatogram provided.

  • No quantitative purity analysis

    This is a contamination screening report only. No HPLC purity percentage or quantitative assay is provided for the peptides.

  • Batch number present

    Batch Test-ED7 clearly stated on both the report and the vial photograph.

  • Known testing laboratory

    Janoshik Analytical is a recognized third-party testing lab in the peptide/research chemical community.

  • Verification URL and unique key provided

    Verification URL www.janoshik.com/verify/ with unique key XYW39YCTD145 allows independent verification.

  • Limited scope of testing

    Only contamination screening (identity) was performed. No purity quantification, heavy metals, microbial, endotoxin, sterility, or residual solvent testing.

  • Professional formatting and supporting data

    Report includes mass spectra, chromatogram, sample photograph, QR code, and signature. Formatting is consistent with Janoshik's known report style.

PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.