Public COA audit

TB-500

Audited September 5, 2026

Mostly consistent, with concerns

Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.

Legitimacy
92
Confidence
93%
Panels
4/7
Purity (printed)
99.9%

Scored high because the document is mostly consistent but carries soft concerns, limited panel coverage (4/7), and 1 soft concern. To improve: include identity, purity, and endotoxin at minimum.

Document details

Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.

Batch / lot
dzxpmut
Identity method
HPLC-UV-MS
Sample date
2026-04-16
Issue date
2026-05-05

Original certificate

Embedded copy of the stored COA PDF or image. Download it for your records — PeptIQ’s audit is separate from the lab document itself.

Loading original certificate…

7-panel checklist

Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

4 of 7 present · 2 passed · 0 failed · 2 reported · 3 missing

Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.

  • Identity

    Tested · passed · core

    Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).

    ID Confirmed

  • Purity

    Tested · passed · core

    Reported purity percentage for the analyte.

    >99.9%

  • Heavy metals

    Tested · result on file

    Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.

  • Microbial

    Not on this certificate file

    Bioburden / microbial limits testing.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

  • Endotoxin

    Tested · result on file · core

    LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.

  • Sterility

    Not on this certificate file

    Sterility testing where applicable.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

  • Residual solvent / water

    Not on this certificate file

    Residual solvents or water content limits.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

How to read this

Had data · good

Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).

Had data · bad

Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.

Had data · unclear

Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.

Missing on this file

Not on this certificate file. Lowers file thoroughness; a sibling endotoxin/purity report for the same lot may still exist. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

Findings

Evidence-linked observations from this audit.

  • Excellent chromatographic purity

    HPLC purity >99.9% with clean chromatogram showing single dominant peak at 4.50 min

  • Mass spectral confirmation

    Mass spectrum shows expected m/z peaks (446.0, 890.1, 617.1, 744.0) consistent with TB-500 identity

  • Batch/lot number present

    Lot dzxpmut clearly identified

  • Dates within normal range

    Sample received 2026-04-16, tested 2026-04-24, report issued 2026-05-05 - all dates are sequential and reasonable

  • Established testing laboratory

    Krause Analytical LLC is a known peptide testing laboratory in Austin, TX with verification URL provided

  • Multiple testing panels documented

    Methods summary page describes purity/identity (USP/NF 621), endotoxin (USP/NF 86), and metals (USP/NF 233) testing protocols

  • Results not shown for all documented methods

    Page 1 shows only purity and identity results; endotoxin and metals test results are not displayed despite methods being documented on page 4

  • Professional presentation

    Multi-page report with chromatogram, mass spectrum, methods summary, and laboratory director signature

PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.