Public COA audit

TB-500

Audited July 28, 2026

Evidence suggests fabrication

Multiple signals on this document conflict with known lab formats or verification patterns.

Legitimacy
15
Confidence
92%
Panels
0/7

Scored poorly because audit signals point to fabrication or reused paperwork, limited panel coverage (0/7), 5 critical findings, and notable note: "Future Date". To improve: replace this file with an original lab certificate that verifies on the lab portal and include identity, purity, and endotoxin at minimum.

Document details

Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.

Batch / lot
N260710-001
Identity method
HPLC
Issue date
2026-07-17

Original certificate

Embedded copy of the stored COA PDF or image. Download it for your records — PeptIQ’s audit is separate from the lab document itself.

Loading original certificate…

7-panel checklist

Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

0 of 7 present · 0 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 7 missing

Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.

  • Identity

    Not on this certificate file · core

    Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

  • Purity

    Not on this certificate file · core

    Reported purity percentage for the analyte.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

  • Heavy metals

    Not on this certificate file

    Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

  • Microbial

    Not on this certificate file

    Bioburden / microbial limits testing.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

  • Endotoxin

    Not on this certificate file · core

    LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

  • Sterility

    Not on this certificate file

    Sterility testing where applicable.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

  • Residual solvent / water

    Not on this certificate file

    Residual solvents or water content limits.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

How to read this

Had data · good

Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).

Had data · bad

Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.

Had data · unclear

Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.

Missing on this file

Not on this certificate file. Lowers file thoroughness; a sibling endotoxin/purity report for the same lot may still exist. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

Findings

Evidence-linked observations from this audit.

  • Future Date

    Issue date is 2026-07-17, which is in the future. This is a strong indicator of fabrication or template misuse.

  • Unverifiable Laboratory

    Qalitex Inc. with accreditation AGS-US050824-1 cannot be verified. No online presence, accreditation body records, or independent verification available for this entity.

  • Severely Incomplete Testing

    Only a single assay test (mass quantity) is reported. No purity percentage, identity confirmation, impurity profile, or any safety panels (heavy metals, microbial, endotoxin, sterility) are present. This is grossly insufficient for peptide quality control.

  • No Purity Data

    The HPLC test only reports mass (11.4 mg vs 10 mg spec), not purity percentage. A legitimate peptide COA must include purity by HPLC, typically with chromatogram.

  • No Identity Confirmation

    No mass spectrometry, amino acid analysis, or sequence confirmation is provided. Identity of the compound is not verified.

  • Minimal Content

    Page 2 is essentially blank except for a footer statement. Professional COAs typically include detailed test results, chromatograms, or additional documentation on subsequent pages.

  • Multiple Identifiers

    Product has both Batch Number (N260710-001) and Lot Number (SP26-TBV105), which may be legitimate but adds complexity without clear explanation.

PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.