Public COA audit
TB-500 · Thymosin Beta-4
Audited September 5, 2026
Missing panels or key metadata — not enough evidence to treat this as a full certificate.
- Legitimacy
- 62
- Confidence
- 85%
- Panels
- 1/7
Scored lower because the file is incomplete or not a full COA, limited panel coverage (1/7), 1 critical finding, and notable note: "Identity testing present". To improve: upload the full certificate (or the matching sibling purity/endotoxin report) and include identity, purity, and endotoxin at minimum.
Document details
Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.
- Batch / lot
- APR-7308120
- Identity method
- UPLC, Mass Spectrometry (MS)
- Sample date
- 2026-02-18
- Issue date
- 2026-02-28
Original certificate
Embedded copy of the stored COA PDF or image. Download it for your records — PeptIQ’s audit is separate from the lab document itself.
7-panel checklist
Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
1 of 7 present · 0 passed · 0 failed · 1 reported · 6 missing
Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.
Identity
Tested · result on file · core
Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).
MS peaks at 1653.21 m/z (primary), UPLC chromatogram shown
Purity
Not on this certificate file · core
Reported purity percentage for the analyte.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Heavy metals
Not on this certificate file
Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Microbial
Not on this certificate file
Bioburden / microbial limits testing.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Endotoxin
Not on this certificate file · core
LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Sterility
Not on this certificate file
Sterility testing where applicable.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Residual solvent / water
Not on this certificate file
Residual solvents or water content limits.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
How to read this
Had data · good
Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).
Had data · bad
Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.
Had data · unclear
Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.
Missing on this file
Not on this certificate file. Lowers file thoroughness; a sibling endotoxin/purity report for the same lot may still exist. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
Findings
Evidence-linked observations from this audit.
Identity testing present
UPLC chromatogram and mass spectrometry data provided. MS shows primary peak at 1653.21 m/z consistent with TB-500. Pubchem CID 16132341 referenced.
No purity quantification
UPLC chromatogram is shown but no numerical purity percentage is stated. Cannot determine if sample meets purity specifications.
Purity/identity report file
This certificate file looks like a purity/identity report. Many vendors publish a separate endotoxin report for the same lot — missing endotoxin on this file alone does not prove the lot was never tested.
Lot number present
Lot number APR-7308120 clearly stated.
Dates present and valid
Received date 02/18/2026, analysis conducted 02/28/2026. Both dates are valid and in proper sequence (received before analysis).
Testing lab identified
Horizon Analytical identified as testing lab with contact information and verification URL provided. Lab claims to be US-based.
Professional presentation
Document has professional formatting with clear branding, chromatograms, and mass spectrometry data. Layout is consistent with analytical lab reports.
PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.