Public COA audit

TB-500 · Thymosin Beta-4

Audited September 5, 2026

Mostly consistent, with concerns

Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.

Legitimacy
72
Confidence
85%
Panels
2/7
Purity (printed)
99.5%

Scored moderately because the document is mostly consistent but carries soft concerns, limited panel coverage (2/7), 3 soft concerns, and notable note: "High purity confirmed". To improve: include identity, purity, and endotoxin at minimum.

Document details

Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.

Batch / lot
TB41007032025-10
Identity method
HPLC with UV Detection Coupled with Mass Spectrometry
Sample date
2025-08-04
Issue date
2025-08-05

Original certificate

Embedded copy of the stored COA PDF or image. Download it for your records — PeptIQ’s audit is separate from the lab document itself.

Loading original certificate…

7-panel checklist

Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

2 of 7 present · 2 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 5 missing

Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.

  • Identity

    Tested · passed · core

    Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).

    Thymosin Beta-4

  • Purity

    Tested · passed · core

    Reported purity percentage for the analyte.

    99.50%

  • Heavy metals

    Not on this certificate file

    Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

  • Microbial

    Not on this certificate file

    Bioburden / microbial limits testing.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

  • Endotoxin

    Not on this certificate file · core

    LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

  • Sterility

    Not on this certificate file

    Sterility testing where applicable.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

  • Residual solvent / water

    Not on this certificate file

    Residual solvents or water content limits.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

How to read this

Had data · good

Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).

Had data · bad

Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.

Had data · unclear

Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.

Missing on this file

Not on this certificate file. Lowers file thoroughness; a sibling endotoxin/purity report for the same lot may still exist. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

Findings

Evidence-linked observations from this audit.

  • High purity confirmed

    99.50% purity by HPLC-MS is excellent and typical for research-grade peptides

  • Identity confirmed by mass spectrometry

    Mass spec data shows expected charge states for Thymosin Beta-4 ([M+5H]5+, [M+6H]6+, [M+4H]4+)

  • Limited testing scope

    This COA only covers purity and identity testing. No heavy metals, microbial, endotoxin, sterility, or residual solvent/water panels are present on this report

  • Lab verification unclear

    Freedom Diagnostics website and contact information provided, but independent verification of lab accreditation/credentials not available from document alone

  • Minor formatting inconsistencies

    Document shows 'Assession Number' (likely typo for 'Accession'), and lot number format TB41007032025-10 appears to embed a date (07/03/2025) which predates the received date (08/04/2025)

  • Dates are valid and recent

    Received 2025-08-04, reported 2025-08-05 - both dates are valid and show quick turnaround

  • Batch information present

    Lot number TB41007032025-10 provided with net peptide content 10.76mg for nominal 10mg product

Timing & next steps

Practical follow-ups based on document age and gaps.

  • coa age

    This COA was issued over a year ago (396 days) — consider whether a retest is warranted for this batch.

PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.