Public COA audit
TB-500 · Thymosin beta4
Audited September 5, 2026
Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.
- Legitimacy
- 72
- Confidence
- 85%
- Panels
- 2/7
- Purity (printed)
- 99%
Scored moderately because the document is mostly consistent but carries soft concerns, limited panel coverage (2/7), 2 soft concerns, and notable note: "High purity confirmed". To improve: include identity, purity, and endotoxin at minimum.
Document details
Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.
- Batch / lot
- SW-A014-05
- Identity method
- Mass Spectrometry and UV
- Issue date
- 2022-12-22
Original certificate
Embedded copy of the stored COA PDF or image. Download it for your records — PeptIQ’s audit is separate from the lab document itself.
7-panel checklist
Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
2 of 7 present · 2 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 5 missing
Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.
Identity
Tested · passed · core
Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).
Molecular weight confirmed: Expected 5017.51 g, Measured 5017.60 g
Purity
Tested · passed · core
Reported purity percentage for the analyte.
99.0%
Heavy metals
Not on this certificate file
Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Microbial
Not on this certificate file
Bioburden / microbial limits testing.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Endotoxin
Not on this certificate file · core
LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Sterility
Not on this certificate file
Sterility testing where applicable.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Residual solvent / water
Not on this certificate file
Residual solvents or water content limits.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
How to read this
Had data · good
Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).
Had data · bad
Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.
Had data · unclear
Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.
Missing on this file
Not on this certificate file. Lowers file thoroughness; a sibling endotoxin/purity report for the same lot may still exist. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
Findings
Evidence-linked observations from this audit.
High purity confirmed
99.0% purity by UV detection with clear chromatogram showing main peak at 12.55 min (99.0% area) and minor peak at 20.16 min (1.0% area)
Molecular weight verified
Mass spectrometry confirms expected mass 5017.51 g vs measured 5017.60 g (0.09 g difference, within acceptable tolerance)
Limited lab verification information
MZ Biolabs contact information provided but no independent accreditation or certification details visible on this COA
Purity/identity-scoped report only
This COA covers purity and identity testing only. Heavy metals, microbial, endotoxin, sterility, and residual solvent/water panels are not included in this particular report. This is common for split testing protocols where different aspects may be reported separately.
Clear lot identification
Lot number SW-A014-05 clearly stated with client SW Peptides identified
Dates properly documented
Analysis date 2022-12-22 and signature date 2022-12-23 are consistent and reasonable (signature one day after analysis)
Professional presentation
Document includes proper header, chromatogram, peak list, PubChem reference, analyst signature, and explanatory notes about injectable peptides containing salts/sugars
Timing & next steps
Practical follow-ups based on document age and gaps.
coa age
This COA was issued over a year ago (1353 days) — consider whether a retest is warranted for this batch.
PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.