Public COA audit

SS-31 · Elamipritide

Audited September 5, 2026

Mostly consistent, with concerns

Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.

Legitimacy
92
Confidence
93%
Panels
3/7
Purity (printed)
99.9%

Scored high because the document is mostly consistent but carries soft concerns, limited panel coverage (3/7), and 1 soft concern. To improve: include identity, purity, and endotoxin at minimum.

Document details

Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.

Batch / lot
hgmwynm
Identity method
HPLC-UV-MS
Sample date
2026-02-26
Issue date
2026-03-02

Original certificate

Embedded copy of the stored COA PDF or image. Download it for your records — PeptIQ’s audit is separate from the lab document itself.

Loading original certificate…

7-panel checklist

Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

3 of 7 present · 3 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 4 missing

Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.

  • Identity

    Tested · passed · core

    Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).

    ID Confirmed

  • Purity

    Tested · passed · core

    Reported purity percentage for the analyte.

    >99.9%

  • Heavy metals

    Not on this certificate file

    Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

  • Microbial

    Not on this certificate file

    Bioburden / microbial limits testing.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

  • Endotoxin

    Tested · passed · core

    LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.

    <0.5 EU

  • Sterility

    Not on this certificate file

    Sterility testing where applicable.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

  • Residual solvent / water

    Not on this certificate file

    Residual solvents or water content limits.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

How to read this

Had data · good

Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).

Had data · bad

Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.

Had data · unclear

Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.

Missing on this file

Not on this certificate file. Lowers file thoroughness; a sibling endotoxin/purity report for the same lot may still exist. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

Findings

Evidence-linked observations from this audit.

  • Excellent chromatographic purity

    >99.9% purity by HPLC-UV/MS with clean chromatogram showing single dominant peak at 4.56 min

  • Mass spectral confirmation

    ID confirmed by HPLC-UV-MS with reference spectrum match shown on page 2

  • Batch/lot number present

    Lot hgmwynm, Lab # 201845, Project 145100

  • Complete date information

    Sample received 2/26/2026, testing dates 2/28/2026-3/2/2026, all dates are valid and consistent

  • Established testing laboratory

    Krause Analytical LLC, Austin TX, with verification URL https://finnrick.com/verify and signed by Laboratory Director Mark C. Krause

  • Core panels present

    Purity, identity, and endotoxin testing completed. Heavy metals method described but not run for this sample. Microbial, sterility, and residual solvent panels not included.

  • Professional presentation

    Multi-page report with detailed methods summary, chromatogram, mass spectrum, and proper USP method references (USP 621, 85, 233)

  • Label claim discrepancy

    Label claim 50 mg but actual content 45.5 mg (91.0% of label claim). This is within typical variance but worth noting.

PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.