Public COA audit
SLU-PP-332 · GW-501516
Audited July 28, 2026
Multiple signals on this document conflict with known lab formats or verification patterns.
- Legitimacy
- 25
- Confidence
- 88%
- Panels
- 2/7
- Purity (printed)
- 99.24%
Document details
Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.
- Batch / lot
- SHREDX-0001
- Identity method
- LC-MS with UV detection
- Sample date
- 2024-12-27
- Issue date
- 2025-01-04
7-panel checklist
Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
2 of 7 present · 2 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 5 missing
Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.
Identity
Tested · passed · core
Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).
SLU-PP-332 Conforms
Purity
Tested · passed · core
Reported purity percentage for the analyte.
99.24%
Heavy metals
Not on this COA
Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Microbial
Not on this COA
Bioburden / microbial limits testing.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Endotoxin
Not on this COA · core
LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Sterility
Not on this COA
Sterility testing where applicable.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Residual solvent / water
Not on this COA
Residual solvents or water content limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
How to read this
Had data · good
Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).
Had data · bad
Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.
Had data · unclear
Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.
Missing
Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
Findings
Evidence-linked observations from this audit.
Identical COA number across multiple compounds
All three pages share COA #10020 and Security Key BIOLABS2010, but test different compounds (SLU-PP-332, GW-501516, AOD9604) with different batch numbers. Legitimate labs issue unique COA numbers per sample/batch.
Inconsistent batch numbering
Page 1 shows batch SHREDX-0001, pages 2-3 show SHRED-0001. All claim same sample receipt date (12/27/24) and analysis date (1/4/25), suggesting these are from the same submission but with conflicting batch identifiers.
Unit inconsistency in quantity measurement
Page 2 shows specification '5000mcg' but result '4892mg' - mixing micrograms and milligrams in the same field. 4892mg would be 4,892,000mcg, a massive discrepancy. Likely a typographical error but undermines document credibility.
Generic lab branding and unverifiable identity
BioRegen presents as 'Independent Testing, Trusted Results' but provides minimal verifiable information. The verification URL 'bioregen.com/verify' and contact '[email protected]' cannot be independently confirmed as legitimate analytical laboratory infrastructure.
Limited testing scope
Only identity and purity testing performed. No heavy metals, microbial, endotoxin, sterility, or residual solvent testing. While not automatically disqualifying, this is minimal for compounds intended for human research use.
Dates within normal range
Sample received 2024-12-27, analysis conducted 2025-01-04. Both dates are in the past relative to 2026-07-28 and show reasonable 8-day turnaround.
Timing & next steps
Practical follow-ups based on document age and gaps.
coa age
This COA was issued over a year ago (570 days) — consider whether a retest is warranted for this batch.
PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.