Public COA audit
SLU-PP-332 · GW-501516
Audited September 5, 2026
Multiple signals on this document conflict with known lab formats or verification patterns.
- Legitimacy
- 15
- Confidence
- 92%
- Panels
- 2/7
- Purity (printed)
- 99.24%
Scored poorly because audit signals point to fabrication or reused paperwork, limited panel coverage (2/7), 2 critical findings, and notable note: "Inconsistent batch/lot numbers across pages". To improve: replace this file with an original lab certificate that verifies on the lab portal and include identity, purity, and endotoxin at minimum.
Document details
Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.
- Batch / lot
- SHREDX-0001
- Identity method
- LC-MS with UV detection
- Sample date
- 2024-12-27
- Issue date
- 2025-01-04
Original certificate
Embedded copy of the stored COA PDF or image. Download it for your records — PeptIQ’s audit is separate from the lab document itself.
7-panel checklist
Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
2 of 7 present · 2 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 5 missing
Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.
Identity
Tested · passed · core
Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).
SLU-PP-332 / GW-501516 / AOD-9604
Purity
Tested · passed · core
Reported purity percentage for the analyte.
99.24% / 99.03% / 100%
Heavy metals
Not on this certificate file
Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Microbial
Not on this certificate file
Bioburden / microbial limits testing.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Endotoxin
Not on this certificate file · core
LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Sterility
Not on this certificate file
Sterility testing where applicable.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Residual solvent / water
Not on this certificate file
Residual solvents or water content limits.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
How to read this
Had data · good
Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).
Had data · bad
Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.
Had data · unclear
Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.
Missing on this file
Not on this certificate file. Lowers file thoroughness; a sibling endotoxin/purity report for the same lot may still exist. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
Findings
Evidence-linked observations from this audit.
Inconsistent batch/lot numbers across pages
Page 1 shows SHREDX-0001, pages 2-3 show SHRED-0001 for different compounds, suggesting these are separate samples but all share COA #10020 and security key BIOLABS2010
Multiple compounds under single COA number
Three different compounds (SLU-PP-332, GW-501516, AOD9604) all share identical COA #10020 and security key BIOLABS2010, which is highly irregular for independent testing
Unit inconsistency on page 2
Page 2 shows Quantity specification as 5000mcg but result as 4892mg (should be mcg), a 1000x unit error
100% purity claim for peptide
Page 3 reports exactly 100% purity for AOD9604, which is extremely rare for peptides and typically indicates rounding or measurement limitations rather than true absolute purity
Generic lab branding and contact
BioRegen presents as generic independent testing lab with minimal identifying information; verification URL provided but authenticity cannot be confirmed from document alone
Limited testing scope
Only identity and purity testing performed; no heavy metals, microbial, endotoxin, sterility, or solvent/water testing documented
Capsule appearance notation
All three pages list appearance as 'White powder (Capsule)' which is unusual phrasing - typically COAs test raw material or finished product, not both simultaneously
Timing & next steps
Practical follow-ups based on document age and gaps.
coa age
This COA was issued over a year ago (609 days) — consider whether a retest is warranted for this batch.
PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.