Public COA audit

Semax

Audited July 28, 2026

Mostly consistent, with concerns

Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.

Legitimacy
92
Confidence
88%
Panels
5/7
Purity (printed)
99.65%

Document details

Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.

Batch / lot
CR-SMX-10-2605-1
Identity method
HPLC-RTM
Sample date
2026-05-22
Issue date
2026-06-01

7-panel checklist

Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

5 of 7 present · 5 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 2 missing

Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.

  • Identity

    Tested · passed · core

    Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).

    Confirmed

  • Purity

    Tested · passed · core

    Reported purity percentage for the analyte.

    99.65%

  • Heavy metals

    Tested · passed

    Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.

    All Not Detected

  • Microbial

    Not on this COA

    Bioburden / microbial limits testing.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Endotoxin

    Tested · passed · core

    LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.

    0.288 EU/mL

  • Sterility

    Tested · passed

    Sterility testing where applicable.

    No Growth

  • Residual solvent / water

    Not on this COA

    Residual solvents or water content limits.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

How to read this

Had data · good

Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).

Had data · bad

Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.

Had data · unclear

Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.

Missing

Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

Findings

Evidence-linked observations from this audit.

  • High purity confirmed

    99.65% purity by HPLC with conformity testing across 3 samples (mean 99.57%, std dev 0.0589%). This is normal for research-grade peptides.

  • Identity confirmed

    Semax identity confirmed by HPLC retention time matching with reference standard. Includes chromatogram and fentanyl screen (not detected).

  • Batch information complete

    Lot CR-SMX-10-2605-1, COA-2026-TNJQ5K, Accession ACC-2026-3080. Net peptide content 17.55 mg reported.

  • Dates consistent

    Received 2026-05-22, analyzed and issued 2026-06-01. All dates are on or before 2026-07-28 and logically sequenced.

  • Lab credentials present

    ILS Laboratories, San Diego CA, claims ISO/IEC 17025 accreditation. Signed by Dr. Greg Kalyuzhny, Lab Director. Verification URL and QR code provided.

  • Comprehensive testing panel

    Five panels present: identity, purity, heavy metals (5 elements), endotoxin, and sterility. All passed. Missing: microbial count and residual solvents/water content.

  • Missing microbial panel

    No microbial enumeration (TAMC/TYMC) reported. Sterility testing (PCR) is present but does not replace quantitative microbial limits testing.

  • Missing residual solvents/water

    No residual solvent or water content analysis reported. Common for research peptides but would be expected for pharmaceutical-grade material.

  • Professional presentation

    Well-formatted 2-page COA with detailed methodology notes, conformity testing statistics, and clear pass/fail indicators. Includes product photo.

PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.