Public COA audit

Semax

Audited September 5, 2026

Mostly consistent, with concerns

Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.

Legitimacy
92
Confidence
93%
Panels
3/7
Purity (printed)
99.8%

Scored high because the document is mostly consistent but carries soft concerns, limited panel coverage (3/7), and 1 soft concern. To improve: include identity, purity, and endotoxin at minimum.

Document details

Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.

Batch / lot
CR-SMX10-2603-1
Identity method
FTIR (USP <197A>)
Sample date
2026-04-02
Issue date
2026-04-05

Original certificate

Embedded copy of the stored COA PDF or image. Download it for your records — PeptIQ’s audit is separate from the lab document itself.

Loading original certificate…

7-panel checklist

Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

3 of 7 present · 3 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 4 missing

Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.

  • Identity

    Tested · passed · core

    Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).

    FTIR sample spectrum confirms the presence of Semax with addition of excipient(s)/fillers

  • Purity

    Tested · passed · core

    Reported purity percentage for the analyte.

    99.8%

  • Heavy metals

    Not on this certificate file

    Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

  • Microbial

    Not on this certificate file

    Bioburden / microbial limits testing.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

  • Endotoxin

    Tested · passed · core

    LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.

    14.9 EU/vial (limit: 40 EU/vial)

  • Sterility

    Not on this certificate file

    Sterility testing where applicable.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

  • Residual solvent / water

    Not on this certificate file

    Residual solvents or water content limits.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

How to read this

Had data · good

Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).

Had data · bad

Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.

Had data · unclear

Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.

Missing on this file

Not on this certificate file. Lowers file thoroughness; a sibling endotoxin/purity report for the same lot may still exist. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

Findings

Evidence-linked observations from this audit.

  • High HPLC purity confirmed

    HPLC purity of 99.8% meets specification (≥98%). This is normal for research-grade peptides.

  • Identity confirmed by FTIR

    FTIR spectrum confirms presence of Semax with excipients/fillers. Potency assay shows 94.2-102.1% of labeled 10mg content across triplicate measurements.

  • Endotoxin testing performed separately

    This is a multi-document COA set. Page 1-2 cover purity/identity/potency (report IF-824-QSA-TR006-BTL26130-04). Page 3 is a separate endotoxin report (IF-824-QSA-TR006-BTL26130-23, dated 4/10/2026) for the same lot CR-SMX10-2603-1, showing 14.9 EU/vial (PASS, limit 40 EU/vial).

  • Lot number clearly stated

    Lot CR-SMX10-2603-1 is consistent across all three pages of the COA set.

  • Dates are valid and consistent

    Main report dated 4/5/2026 (tested 4/2/2026), endotoxin report dated 4/10/2026 (tested 4/8/2026). All dates are on or before today (2026-09-05) and follow logical sequence.

  • Lab information complete

    BTLabs, 5730 Corporate Way Suite 220, West Palm Beach FL 33407. Contact info and website provided. Signed by two scientists (Andrea Castro AS, Verna Zheng AS).

  • Professional presentation

    Report includes QR code, watermarks, triplicate measurements, FTIR and HPLC chromatograms, detailed sample description, and USP method references.

  • Some panels not included

    Heavy metals, microbial contamination, sterility, and residual solvents/water content were not tested. The Testing Purpose section explicitly states the report does not cover particulate matter, microbial contamination, or presence of endotoxins (though endotoxin was tested separately). This is common for research-grade peptide testing.

PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.