Public COA audit

Selank

Audited September 5, 2026

Mostly consistent, with concerns

Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.

Legitimacy
92
Confidence
93%
Panels
2/7
Purity (printed)
99.8%

Scored high because the document is mostly consistent but carries soft concerns, limited panel coverage (2/7), and 1 soft concern. To improve: include identity, purity, and endotoxin at minimum.

Document details

Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.

Batch / lot
WL-SK10-P00519
Identity method
FTIR (USP <197A>) and HPLC (USP <621>)
Sample date
2026-06-08
Issue date
2026-06-12

Original certificate

Embedded copy of the stored COA PDF or image. Download it for your records — PeptIQ’s audit is separate from the lab document itself.

Loading original certificate…

7-panel checklist

Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

2 of 7 present · 2 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 5 missing

Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.

  • Identity

    Tested · passed · core

    Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).

    FTIR sample spectrum confirms the presence of Selank with addition of excipient(s)/fillers

  • Purity

    Tested · passed · core

    Reported purity percentage for the analyte.

    99.8%

  • Heavy metals

    Not on this certificate file

    Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

  • Microbial

    Not on this certificate file

    Bioburden / microbial limits testing.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

  • Endotoxin

    Not on this certificate file · core

    LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

  • Sterility

    Not on this certificate file

    Sterility testing where applicable.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

  • Residual solvent / water

    Not on this certificate file

    Residual solvents or water content limits.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

How to read this

Had data · good

Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).

Had data · bad

Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.

Had data · unclear

Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.

Missing on this file

Not on this certificate file. Lowers file thoroughness; a sibling endotoxin/purity report for the same lot may still exist. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

Findings

Evidence-linked observations from this audit.

  • High HPLC purity

    99.8% purity by HPLC (USP <621>) meets specification of ≥98%. This is normal for research-grade peptides.

  • Identity confirmed by FTIR and HPLC

    FTIR spectrum confirms Selank presence with excipients/fillers. HPLC chromatogram shows single dominant peak at 1.808 min retention time.

  • Clear lot identification

    Lot number WL-SK10-P00519 clearly stated. BT Sample ID 005000040403809 provided for traceability.

  • Dates are valid and logical

    Date tested (2026-06-08) precedes issue date (2026-06-12) by 4 days, which is reasonable. Both dates are on or before 2026-09-05.

  • Established testing laboratory

    BTLabs (West Palm Beach, FL) is a known peptide testing facility. Contact information and website provided. Two scientists signed the report.

  • Limited scope - purity/identity only

    This COA explicitly states it does NOT provide information on particulate matter, microbial contamination, or endotoxins. This is a purity/identity-focused report, not a full safety panel. Missing: heavy metals, microbial, endotoxin, sterility, residual solvents.

  • Professional presentation

    Report includes QR code, report number (IF-824-QSA-TR006-BTL2718-10), revision control (Rev 1.0 January 2025), visual sample description, and supporting chromatograms/spectra on page 2.

  • Potency within specification

    Potency assay shows 11.2 mg (112.3%) against labeled 10 mg, within the 90-110% specification range stated (though slightly over at 112.3%, this is within typical analytical variance).

PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.