Public COA audit
Reta · GLP RT
Audited September 5, 2026
Multiple signals on this document conflict with known lab formats or verification patterns.
- Legitimacy
- 15
- Confidence
- 92%
- Panels
- 2/7
- Purity (printed)
- 99.887%
Scored poorly because audit signals point to fabrication or reused paperwork, limited panel coverage (2/7), 2 critical findings, and notable note: "Unverifiable testing laboratory". To improve: replace this file with an original lab certificate that verifies on the lab portal and include identity, purity, and endotoxin at minimum.
Document details
Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.
- Batch / lot
- 665394
- Identity method
- HPLC with UV Detection Coupled with Mass Spectrometry
- Sample date
- 2026-04-06
- Issue date
- 2026-04-07
Original certificate
Embedded copy of the stored COA PDF or image. Download it for your records — PeptIQ’s audit is separate from the lab document itself.
7-panel checklist
Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
2 of 7 present · 2 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 5 missing
Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.
Identity
Tested · passed · core
Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).
GLP RT confirmed by mass spectrometry
Purity
Tested · passed · core
Reported purity percentage for the analyte.
99.887%
Heavy metals
Not on this certificate file
Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Microbial
Not on this certificate file
Bioburden / microbial limits testing.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Endotoxin
Not on this certificate file · core
LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Sterility
Not on this certificate file
Sterility testing where applicable.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Residual solvent / water
Not on this certificate file
Residual solvents or water content limits.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
How to read this
Had data · good
Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).
Had data · bad
Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.
Had data · unclear
Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.
Missing on this file
Not on this certificate file. Lowers file thoroughness; a sibling endotoxin/purity report for the same lot may still exist. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
Findings
Evidence-linked observations from this audit.
Unverifiable testing laboratory
Freedom Diagnostics and FreedomDiagnosticsTesting.com do not appear in established databases of analytical testing laboratories. The domain shows no active website or verifiable business presence. The email [email protected] cannot be independently verified.
Unprofessional document quality
Multiple formatting issues: inconsistent spacing, 'TEST TEST TEST' placeholder text visible in header, generic layout inconsistent with established analytical labs, stock photo-quality vial image rather than actual sample documentation.
Vague compound identification
Product listed as 'Reta 10mg' with identity 'GLP RT' but no full chemical name, CAS number, molecular formula, or expected molecular weight provided. Mass spec shows peaks but no interpretation or comparison to theoretical values.
Minimal analyst credentials
Signatory 'Alex Johnson, Principal Chemist' provided with no professional credentials, certifications, or verifiable background. No laboratory accreditation mentioned (ISO 17025, GMP, etc.).
Limited testing scope
Only purity and identity testing performed. No safety panels (endotoxin, heavy metals, microbial, sterility, residual solvents) which are standard for research-grade peptides intended for biological use.
Generic disclaimer language
Disclaimer text appears boilerplate and does not reference specific laboratory SOPs, quality systems, or regulatory frameworks typical of legitimate analytical labs.
Dates within acceptable range
Received 2026-04-06, reported 2026-04-07 (1-day turnaround). Both dates are prior to current date 2026-09-05.
PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.