Public COA audit
Retatrutide
Audited July 29, 2026
Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.
- Legitimacy
- 72
- Confidence
- 85%
- Panels
- 2/7
- Purity (printed)
- 99.57%
Document details
Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.
- Batch / lot
- 129615
- Identity method
- HPLC-UV-MS
- Sample date
- 2025-10-14
- Issue date
- 2025-10-23
7-panel checklist
Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
2 of 7 present · 2 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 5 missing
Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.
Identity
Tested · passed · core
Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).
ID Confirmed
Purity
Tested · passed · core
Reported purity percentage for the analyte.
99.57%
Heavy metals
Not on this COA
Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Microbial
Not on this COA
Bioburden / microbial limits testing.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Endotoxin
Not on this COA · core
LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Sterility
Not on this COA
Sterility testing where applicable.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Residual solvent / water
Not on this COA
Residual solvents or water content limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
How to read this
Had data · good
Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).
Had data · bad
Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.
Had data · unclear
Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.
Missing
Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
Findings
Evidence-linked observations from this audit.
High purity confirmed
Chromatographic purity of 99.57% by HPLC-UV/MS with clean chromatogram showing single major peak at 6.52 minutes
Identity confirmed by mass spectrometry
Mass spectrum matches reference spectrum for Retatrutide with characteristic m/z peaks at 1185 and 1579
Dual branding inconsistency
Document shows both 'Finnrick Analytics' and 'Krause Analytical LLC' branding. Header indicates Finnrick.com/Austin TX, but footer and signature reference Krause Analytical LLC at same address. This dual branding pattern is unusual for a testing laboratory COA.
Laboratory verification needed
Verification URL provided (https://finnrick.com/verify with ID: hrkeydr) but the relationship between Finnrick and Krause Analytical requires clarification
Batch information present
Lab # 129615, Project 135393 clearly documented
Date sequence logical
Sample received 10/14/2025, testing performed 10/22/2025, report issued 10/23/2025 - all dates are sequential and reasonable
Limited testing scope
Only identity and purity panels performed. No heavy metals, microbial, endotoxin, sterility, or residual solvent testing. This is common for basic peptide analysis but limits comprehensive quality assessment.
Professional presentation with supporting data
Includes chromatogram and mass spectrum data supporting the analytical results. Document formatting appears professional with appropriate technical detail.
PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.