Public COA audit

Retatrutide

Audited September 5, 2026

Incomplete documentation

Missing panels or key metadata — not enough evidence to treat this as a full certificate.

Legitimacy
45
Confidence
75%
Panels
1/7

Scored poorly because the file is incomplete or not a full COA, limited panel coverage (1/7), 3 critical findings, and notable note: "Microbial testing only". To improve: upload the full certificate (or the matching sibling purity/endotoxin report) and include identity, purity, and endotoxin at minimum.

Document details

Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.

Batch / lot
RT24D-10-002
Identity method
TAMC+TYMC
Sample date
2024-06-26
Issue date
2024-06-27

Original certificate

Embedded copy of the stored COA PDF or image. Download it for your records — PeptIQ’s audit is separate from the lab document itself.

Loading original certificate…

7-panel checklist

Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

1 of 7 present · 1 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 6 missing

Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.

  • Identity

    Not on this certificate file · core

    Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

  • Purity

    Not on this certificate file · core

    Reported purity percentage for the analyte.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

  • Heavy metals

    Not on this certificate file

    Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

  • Microbial

    Tested · passed

    Bioburden / microbial limits testing.

    TAMC: PASS, TYMC: PASS

  • Endotoxin

    Not on this certificate file · core

    LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

  • Sterility

    Not on this certificate file

    Sterility testing where applicable.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

  • Residual solvent / water

    Not on this certificate file

    Residual solvents or water content limits.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

How to read this

Had data · good

Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).

Had data · bad

Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.

Had data · unclear

Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.

Missing on this file

Not on this certificate file. Lowers file thoroughness; a sibling endotoxin/purity report for the same lot may still exist. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

Findings

Evidence-linked observations from this audit.

  • Microbial testing only

    This report contains ONLY microbial testing (TAMC/TYMC). No purity, identity, endotoxin, heavy metals, or other standard peptide COA panels are present. This is a partial/supplemental report, not a complete COA.

  • No purity data

    No HPLC or other purity analysis is included in this report.

  • No identity confirmation

    No mass spectrometry, amino acid analysis, or other identity confirmation method is present.

  • Known testing laboratory

    Janoshik is a recognized third-party testing laboratory in the peptide/research compound space with verification system.

  • Batch number present

    Batch RT24D-10-002 is clearly stated.

  • Dates consistent

    Testing ordered 24 JUN 2024, sample received 26 JUN 2024, analysis conducted 27 JUN 2024 - logical sequence.

  • Scope limitation

    This appears to be a microbial-only supplemental test report. Paramount Peptides may have separate reports for purity/identity/endotoxin for this lot. This single document is insufficient as a complete COA.

Timing & next steps

Practical follow-ups based on document age and gaps.

  • coa age

    This COA was issued over a year ago (800 days) — consider whether a retest is warranted for this batch.

PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.