Public COA audit

Retatrutide

Audited July 29, 2026

Incomplete documentation

Missing panels or key metadata — not enough evidence to treat this as a full certificate.

Legitimacy
55
Confidence
75%
Panels
2/7

Document details

Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.

Batch / lot
RT24D-10-002
Sample date
2024-06-26
Issue date
2024-06-27

7-panel checklist

Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

2 of 7 present · 2 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 5 missing

Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.

  • Identity

    Not on this COA · core

    Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Purity

    Not on this COA · core

    Reported purity percentage for the analyte.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Heavy metals

    Tested · passed

    Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.

    PASS

  • Microbial

    Tested · passed

    Bioburden / microbial limits testing.

    PASS

  • Endotoxin

    Not on this COA · core

    LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Sterility

    Not on this COA

    Sterility testing where applicable.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Residual solvent / water

    Not on this COA

    Residual solvents or water content limits.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

How to read this

Had data · good

Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).

Had data · bad

Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.

Had data · unclear

Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.

Missing

Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

Findings

Evidence-linked observations from this audit.

  • No purity data

    This COA does not include any HPLC or other purity measurement, which is the most critical metric for peptide quality assessment.

  • No identity confirmation

    No mass spectrometry, amino acid analysis, or other identity confirmation method is present. Cannot verify the compound is actually Retatrutide.

  • Limited testing scope

    Only microbial testing (TAMC/TYMC) was performed. No purity, identity, heavy metals, endotoxin, or other standard peptide testing panels are included.

  • Known testing lab

    Janoshik is a recognized third-party testing laboratory in the peptide research community.

  • Batch number present

    Batch RT24D-10-002 is clearly identified.

  • Verification key provided

    Unique verification key F65IZMVGHFVA provided with URL for independent verification at janoshik.com/verify/

Timing & next steps

Practical follow-ups based on document age and gaps.

  • coa age

    This COA was issued over a year ago (762 days) — consider whether a retest is warranted for this batch.

PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.