Public COA audit

Retatrutide

Audited July 29, 2026

Consistent with a legitimate COA

Document structure and test panels align with what we expect from authentic lab reports.

Legitimacy
95
Confidence
95%
Panels
3/7
Purity (printed)
99.04%

Document details

Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.

Batch / lot
Blue Cap
Identity method
HPLC-RTM
Sample date
2026-06-05
Issue date
2026-06-05

7-panel checklist

Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

3 of 7 present · 2 passed · 0 failed · 1 reported · 4 missing

Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.

  • Identity

    Tested · passed · core

    Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).

    Confirmed

  • Purity

    Tested · passed · core

    Reported purity percentage for the analyte.

    99.04%

  • Heavy metals

    Not on this COA

    Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Microbial

    Not on this COA

    Bioburden / microbial limits testing.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Endotoxin

    Tested · result on file · core

    LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.

    0.055 EU/mL

  • Sterility

    Not on this COA

    Sterility testing where applicable.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Residual solvent / water

    Not on this COA

    Residual solvents or water content limits.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

How to read this

Had data · good

Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).

Had data · bad

Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.

Had data · unclear

Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.

Missing

Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

Findings

Evidence-linked observations from this audit.

  • High purity confirmed

    Peptide purity of 99.04% by HPLC meets specification (>=95.0%) and is typical for research-grade peptides

  • Identity confirmed

    Retatrutide confirmed by HPLC retention time match with reference standard

  • Batch information present

    Lot Number: Blue Cap, COA #: COA-2026-KLHVNE, Accession #: ACC-2026-3383

  • Dates consistent

    Date Received: 05/27/2026, Analysis Date: 06/05/2026, Issued: 06/05/2026 - all dates are logical and sequential

  • Lab credentials present

    ILS Laboratories, ISO/IEC 17025 Accredited, with physical address, phone, and verification URL provided

  • Core panels completed

    Identity, purity, fentanyl screen, and endotoxin testing performed. Heavy metals, microbial, sterility, and residual solvent panels not included but not required for all research peptides

  • Professional presentation

    Document includes HPLC chromatogram, QR code for verification, lab director signature, and detailed methodology notes

PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.