Public COA audit

Semaglutide

Audited July 29, 2026

Mostly consistent, with concerns

Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.

Legitimacy
72
Confidence
82%
Panels
1/7
Purity (printed)
99.163%

Document details

Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.

Batch / lot
SEM10N032525
Sample date
2025-04-02
Issue date
2025-04-03

7-panel checklist

Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

1 of 7 present · 0 passed · 0 failed · 1 reported · 6 missing

Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.

  • Identity

    Not on this COA · core

    Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Purity

    Tested · result on file · core

    Reported purity percentage for the analyte.

    99.163%; 99.169%; 99.086%

  • Heavy metals

    Not on this COA

    Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Microbial

    Not on this COA

    Bioburden / microbial limits testing.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Endotoxin

    Not on this COA · core

    LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Sterility

    Not on this COA

    Sterility testing where applicable.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Residual solvent / water

    Not on this COA

    Residual solvents or water content limits.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

How to read this

Had data · good

Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).

Had data · bad

Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.

Had data · unclear

Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.

Missing

Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

Findings

Evidence-linked observations from this audit.

  • High purity reported

    Three measurements averaging ~99.14% purity for Semaglutide, consistent with high-quality research peptide standards

  • No identity confirmation method stated

    Report does not specify the analytical method used for identity confirmation (e.g., MS, NMR). Only purity values and mass measurements are provided.

  • Batch number present

    Batch SEM10N032525 clearly stated

  • Dates are consistent and valid

    Testing ordered 29 MAR 2025, sample received 02 APR 2025, analysis conducted 03 APR 2025. All dates are sequential and within normal timeframes, and all are on or before 2026-07-29.

  • Known testing laboratory

    Janoshik Analytical is a recognized third-party peptide testing laboratory with established reputation in the research peptide community

  • Verification system provided

    Document includes verification URL (www.janoshik.com/verify/) and unique key (2NZTZXKG4741) for authentication

  • Limited testing scope

    Only purity testing performed. No identity confirmation method stated, no heavy metals, microbial, endotoxin, sterility, or residual solvent testing. This is common for basic peptide purity assessments but limits comprehensive quality assurance.

  • Professional presentation

    Document follows standard Janoshik format with clear sections, QR code, signature, and verification information

Timing & next steps

Practical follow-ups based on document age and gaps.

  • coa age

    This COA was issued over a year ago (482 days) — consider whether a retest is warranted for this batch.

PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.