Public COA audit
SLU-PP-332
Audited July 29, 2026
Missing panels or key metadata — not enough evidence to treat this as a full certificate.
- Legitimacy
- 45
- Confidence
- 75%
- Panels
- 1/7
Document details
Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.
- Batch / lot
- 25D014
- Sample date
- 2025-05-27
- Issue date
- 2025-05-28
7-panel checklist
Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
1 of 7 present · 0 passed · 0 failed · 1 reported · 6 missing
Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.
Identity
Tested · result on file · core
Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).
258.26 mcg; 259.77 mcg; 260.31 mcg
Purity
Not on this COA · core
Reported purity percentage for the analyte.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Heavy metals
Not on this COA
Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Microbial
Not on this COA
Bioburden / microbial limits testing.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Endotoxin
Not on this COA · core
LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Sterility
Not on this COA
Sterility testing where applicable.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Residual solvent / water
Not on this COA
Residual solvents or water content limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
How to read this
Had data · good
Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).
Had data · bad
Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.
Had data · unclear
Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.
Missing
Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
Findings
Evidence-linked observations from this audit.
No purity data
The report provides mass measurements (258.26, 259.77, 260.31 mcg) but does not state purity percentage, which is essential for peptide quality assessment
Unclear identity confirmation
Results show three mass values without clear interpretation, method details, or confirmation that the compound is indeed SLU-PP-332
Minimal testing scope
Only qualitative/quantitative analysis performed; no purity, heavy metals, microbial, endotoxin, sterility, or solvent testing
Batch number present
Batch 25D014 clearly stated
Dates present and logical
Testing ordered 22 MAY 2025, sample received 27 MAY 2025, analysis conducted 28 MAY 2025 - all dates are sequential and valid
Known testing laboratory
Janoshik Analytical is a recognized third-party testing lab for research compounds
Verification system provided
Includes verification URL (www.janoshik.com/verify/) and unique key (QCADUBIDSL8M) for authentication
Incomplete results presentation
Results table has empty rows and lacks clear interpretation of the mass measurements provided
Timing & next steps
Practical follow-ups based on document age and gaps.
coa age
This COA was issued over a year ago (427 days) — consider whether a retest is warranted for this batch.
PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.