Public COA audit

SLU-PP-332

Audited September 5, 2026

Incomplete documentation

Missing panels or key metadata — not enough evidence to treat this as a full certificate.

Legitimacy
45
Confidence
75%
Panels
0/7

Scored poorly because the file is incomplete or not a full COA, limited panel coverage (0/7), 3 critical findings, and notable note: "Known testing laboratory". To improve: upload the full certificate (or the matching sibling purity/endotoxin report) and include identity, purity, and endotoxin at minimum.

Document details

Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.

Batch / lot
25D014
Sample date
2025-05-27
Issue date
2025-05-28

Original certificate

Embedded copy of the stored COA PDF or image. Download it for your records — PeptIQ’s audit is separate from the lab document itself.

Loading original certificate…

7-panel checklist

Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

0 of 7 present · 0 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 7 missing

Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.

  • Identity

    Not on this certificate file · core

    Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

  • Purity

    Not on this certificate file · core

    Reported purity percentage for the analyte.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

  • Heavy metals

    Not on this certificate file

    Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

  • Microbial

    Not on this certificate file

    Bioburden / microbial limits testing.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

  • Endotoxin

    Not on this certificate file · core

    LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

  • Sterility

    Not on this certificate file

    Sterility testing where applicable.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

  • Residual solvent / water

    Not on this certificate file

    Residual solvents or water content limits.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

How to read this

Had data · good

Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).

Had data · bad

Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.

Had data · unclear

Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.

Missing on this file

Not on this certificate file. Lowers file thoroughness; a sibling endotoxin/purity report for the same lot may still exist. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

Findings

Evidence-linked observations from this audit.

  • Known testing laboratory

    Janoshik Analytical is a recognized third-party testing lab for research compounds with verification system

  • Batch number present

    Batch 25D014 clearly stated

  • Dates present and logical

    Testing ordered 22 MAY 2025, sample received 27 MAY 2025, analysis conducted 28 MAY 2025 - all dates are sequential and within 2026-09-05 reference date

  • No analytical results provided

    Document states 'Qualitative and quantitative analysis of non-AAS sample' but provides only mass measurements (258.26 mcg; 259.77 mcg; 260.31 mcg) with no purity, identity confirmation, or other test results

  • Purity data absent

    No HPLC chromatogram, purity percentage, or analytical method specified

  • Identity confirmation absent

    No mass spectrometry, NMR, or other identity confirmation data provided

  • Minimal data presentation

    Results section contains only mass measurements without context, units appear to be sample weights rather than analytical results

  • Verification system present

    Document includes verification URL and unique key (QCADUBIDSL8M) for authentication

Timing & next steps

Practical follow-ups based on document age and gaps.

  • coa age

    This COA was issued over a year ago (465 days) — consider whether a retest is warranted for this batch.

PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.