Public COA audit
Slu-PP-332
Audited September 5, 2026
Missing panels or key metadata — not enough evidence to treat this as a full certificate.
- Legitimacy
- 45
- Confidence
- 75%
- Panels
- 0/7
Scored poorly because the file is incomplete or not a full COA, limited panel coverage (0/7), 3 critical findings, and notable note: "No analytical panels present". To improve: upload the full certificate (or the matching sibling purity/endotoxin report) and include identity, purity, and endotoxin at minimum.
Document details
Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.
- Batch / lot
- 25 F 023
- Sample date
- 2025-06-27
- Issue date
- 2025-07-02
Original certificate
Embedded copy of the stored COA PDF or image. Download it for your records — PeptIQ’s audit is separate from the lab document itself.
7-panel checklist
Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
0 of 7 present · 0 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 7 missing
Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.
Identity
Not on this certificate file · core
Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Purity
Not on this certificate file · core
Reported purity percentage for the analyte.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Heavy metals
Not on this certificate file
Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Microbial
Not on this certificate file
Bioburden / microbial limits testing.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Endotoxin
Not on this certificate file · core
LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Sterility
Not on this certificate file
Sterility testing where applicable.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Residual solvent / water
Not on this certificate file
Residual solvents or water content limits.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
How to read this
Had data · good
Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).
Had data · bad
Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.
Had data · unclear
Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.
Missing on this file
Not on this certificate file. Lowers file thoroughness; a sibling endotoxin/purity report for the same lot may still exist. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
Findings
Evidence-linked observations from this audit.
No analytical panels present
Document shows only mass spectrometry values (mcg measurements: 235.14, 237.74, 250.78, 253.90, 247.58) without any purity, identity confirmation, or safety testing panels. The 'Tests requested' section states 'Qualitative and quantitative analysis of non-AAS sample' but no actual analytical results (HPLC, MS identity confirmation, pass/fail criteria) are provided.
No purity data
No HPLC chromatogram, purity percentage, or quantitative analysis results are shown despite the test request mentioning quantitative analysis.
No identity confirmation
No mass spectrometry confirmation of molecular weight, no amino acid analysis, no structural verification method shown. The mcg values listed appear to be sample weights or fragment masses but are not explained or contextualized.
Incomplete results section
The Results section contains a table with compound name and numerical values but no column headers, units explanation, acceptance criteria, or interpretation of what these values represent.
Verification system present
Document includes verification URL (www.janoshik.com/verify/) and unique key (D3462Y92ZI9A) for authentication. Janoshik is a known third-party testing laboratory.
Batch information present
Batch number 25 F 023 clearly stated.
Dates within normal range
Testing ordered 2025-06-25, sample received 2025-06-27, analysis conducted 2025-07-02. All dates are sequential and reasonable (5-7 day turnaround).
Timing & next steps
Practical follow-ups based on document age and gaps.
coa age
This COA was issued over a year ago (430 days) — consider whether a retest is warranted for this batch.
PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.