Public COA audit
NAD+
Audited September 5, 2026
Missing panels or key metadata — not enough evidence to treat this as a full certificate.
- Legitimacy
- 45
- Confidence
- 75%
- Panels
- 1/7
Scored poorly because the file is incomplete or not a full COA, limited panel coverage (1/7), 1 critical finding, and notable note: "No purity data provided". To improve: upload the full certificate (or the matching sibling purity/endotoxin report) and include identity, purity, and endotoxin at minimum.
Document details
Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.
- Batch / lot
- FNAD1000F041825
- Identity method
- qualitative and quantitative analysis
- Sample date
- 2025-04-29
- Issue date
- 2025-05-02
Original certificate
Embedded copy of the stored COA PDF or image. Download it for your records — PeptIQ’s audit is separate from the lab document itself.
7-panel checklist
Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
1 of 7 present · 0 passed · 0 failed · 1 reported · 6 missing
Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.
Identity
Tested · result on file · core
Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).
qualitative analysis performed
Purity
Not on this certificate file · core
Reported purity percentage for the analyte.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Heavy metals
Not on this certificate file
Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Microbial
Not on this certificate file
Bioburden / microbial limits testing.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Endotoxin
Not on this certificate file · core
LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Sterility
Not on this certificate file
Sterility testing where applicable.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Residual solvent / water
Not on this certificate file
Residual solvents or water content limits.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
How to read this
Had data · good
Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).
Had data · bad
Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.
Had data · unclear
Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.
Missing on this file
Not on this certificate file. Lowers file thoroughness; a sibling endotoxin/purity report for the same lot may still exist. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
Findings
Evidence-linked observations from this audit.
No purity data provided
Report shows only mass measurements (1109.30 mg, 1109.71 mg, 1445.69 mg) without any purity percentage, HPLC chromatogram, or assay result. Cannot determine product quality.
Identity testing method unclear
States 'qualitative and quantitative analysis of non-AAS sample' but provides no spectral data, mass spec, NMR, or other identity confirmation. Only mass values are shown.
Minimal testing scope
This report only covers basic identity/quantitation. No purity, heavy metals, microbial, endotoxin, sterility, or solvent testing is included. This may be a partial report or basic screening only.
Incomplete results presentation
Results section shows three mass values with no context, units explanation, or interpretation. Empty rows in results table suggest incomplete data entry or missing information.
Verification system present
Document includes verification URL (www.janoshik.com/verify/) with unique key RC91EP2CY4QM and QR code for authentication.
Dates are reasonable
Testing ordered 24 APR 2025, sample received 29 APR 2025, analysis conducted 02 MAY 2025. Timeline is logical and all dates are in the past relative to 2026-09-05.
Batch number present
Batch FNAD1000F041825 is clearly documented.
Timing & next steps
Practical follow-ups based on document age and gaps.
coa age
This COA was issued over a year ago (491 days) — consider whether a retest is warranted for this batch.
PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.