Public COA audit
NAD+
Audited July 29, 2026
Missing panels or key metadata — not enough evidence to treat this as a full certificate.
- Legitimacy
- 45
- Confidence
- 75%
- Panels
- 1/7
Document details
Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.
- Batch / lot
- FNAD1000F041825
- Identity method
- Qualitative and quantitative analysis
- Sample date
- 2025-04-29
- Issue date
- 2025-05-02
7-panel checklist
Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
1 of 7 present · 0 passed · 0 failed · 1 reported · 6 missing
Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.
Identity
Tested · result on file · core
Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).
1109.30 mg; 1109.71 mg; 1445.69 mg
Purity
Not on this COA · core
Reported purity percentage for the analyte.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Heavy metals
Not on this COA
Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Microbial
Not on this COA
Bioburden / microbial limits testing.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Endotoxin
Not on this COA · core
LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Sterility
Not on this COA
Sterility testing where applicable.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Residual solvent / water
Not on this COA
Residual solvents or water content limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
How to read this
Had data · good
Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).
Had data · bad
Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.
Had data · unclear
Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.
Missing
Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
Findings
Evidence-linked observations from this audit.
No purity data provided
The report provides mass measurements but does not state purity percentage, which is essential for peptide/compound quality assessment.
Unclear result interpretation
Three different mass values are listed (1109.30 mg, 1109.71 mg, 1445.69 mg) without explanation of what they represent or why they differ significantly.
Limited testing scope
Only qualitative/quantitative analysis performed. No purity, heavy metals, microbial, endotoxin, sterility, or residual solvent testing reported.
Batch number present
Batch FNAD1000F041825 clearly stated.
Dates provided and reasonable
Testing ordered 24 APR 2025, sample received 29 APR 2025, analysis conducted 02 MAY 2025. Timeline is logical and all dates are in the past relative to 2026-07-29.
Known testing laboratory
Janoshik is a recognized third-party testing laboratory in the peptide/research compound space.
Verification system present
Document includes verification URL (www.janoshik.com/verify/) and unique key (RC91EP2CY4QM) for authentication, plus QR code.
Timing & next steps
Practical follow-ups based on document age and gaps.
coa age
This COA was issued over a year ago (453 days) — consider whether a retest is warranted for this batch.
PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.