Public COA audit
Melanotan II · Melanotan 2
Audited July 29, 2026
Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.
- Legitimacy
- 72
- Confidence
- 82%
- Panels
- 1/7
- Purity (printed)
- 99.777%
Document details
Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.
- Batch / lot
- MT210N072125
- Sample date
- 2025-08-04
- Issue date
- 2025-08-05
7-panel checklist
Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
1 of 7 present · 0 passed · 0 failed · 1 reported · 6 missing
Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.
Identity
Not on this COA · core
Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Purity
Tested · result on file · core
Reported purity percentage for the analyte.
99.777%; 99.620%; 99.750%
Heavy metals
Not on this COA
Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Microbial
Not on this COA
Bioburden / microbial limits testing.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Endotoxin
Not on this COA · core
LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Sterility
Not on this COA
Sterility testing where applicable.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Residual solvent / water
Not on this COA
Residual solvents or water content limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
How to read this
Had data · good
Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).
Had data · bad
Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.
Had data · unclear
Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.
Missing
Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
Findings
Evidence-linked observations from this audit.
High purity reported
Three purity measurements reported (99.777%, 99.620%, 99.750%) with average ~99.72%. This is within normal range for research-grade peptides.
No identity confirmation method stated
The report shows purity values but does not explicitly state the analytical method used (e.g., HPLC, UPLC, MS) or provide identity confirmation data such as mass spectrometry results.
Batch number present
Batch MT210N072125 clearly stated
Dates are consistent and valid
Testing ordered 30 JUL 2025, sample received 04 AUG 2025, analysis conducted 05 AUG 2025. All dates are sequential and within reasonable timeframe, and all are before 2026-07-29.
Known testing laboratory
Janoshik Analytical is a recognized third-party peptide testing laboratory. Contact information and verification URL provided.
Limited testing scope
Only purity testing performed. No identity confirmation, heavy metals, microbial, endotoxin, sterility, or residual solvent testing. This is common for basic peptide purity testing but limits comprehensive quality assurance.
Professional formatting with verification key
Document includes QR code, verification URL (www.janoshik.com/verify/), unique key (7NLXVPUMB9MF), and signature. Format is consistent with known Janoshik reports.
PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.