Public COA audit
DIHEXA · TESOFENSINE
Audited September 5, 2026
Missing panels or key metadata — not enough evidence to treat this as a full certificate.
- Legitimacy
- 45
- Confidence
- 75%
- Panels
- 1/7
Scored poorly because the file is incomplete or not a full COA, limited panel coverage (1/7), 1 critical finding, and notable note: "Quantitative results only, no purity percentage". To improve: upload the full certificate (or the matching sibling purity/endotoxin report) and include identity, purity, and endotoxin at minimum.
Document details
Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.
- Batch / lot
- 01DIHTESO BPC25
- Identity method
- Qualitative and quantitative analysis of non-AAS sample
- Sample date
- 2025-07-01
- Issue date
- 2025-07-16
Original certificate
Embedded copy of the stored COA PDF or image. Download it for your records — PeptIQ’s audit is separate from the lab document itself.
7-panel checklist
Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
1 of 7 present · 0 passed · 0 failed · 1 reported · 6 missing
Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.
Identity
Tested · result on file · core
Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).
Dihexa: 10.81 mg; 10.43 mg; 10.69 mg. Tesofensine: 255.44 mcg; 250.13 mcg; 255.50 mcg. BPC-157: 115.64 mcg; 149.82 mcg; 105.38 mcg.
Purity
Not on this certificate file · core
Reported purity percentage for the analyte.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Heavy metals
Not on this certificate file
Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Microbial
Not on this certificate file
Bioburden / microbial limits testing.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Endotoxin
Not on this certificate file · core
LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Sterility
Not on this certificate file
Sterility testing where applicable.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Residual solvent / water
Not on this certificate file
Residual solvents or water content limits.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
How to read this
Had data · good
Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).
Had data · bad
Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.
Had data · unclear
Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.
Missing on this file
Not on this certificate file. Lowers file thoroughness; a sibling endotoxin/purity report for the same lot may still exist. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
Findings
Evidence-linked observations from this audit.
Quantitative results only, no purity percentage
Report shows mass quantities for three compounds but does not provide purity percentages or chromatographic data (HPLC/MS). This is a quantitative analysis report, not a typical purity COA.
No purity data provided
No HPLC chromatogram, no purity percentage, no impurity profile. Only mass quantities are reported for the three compounds.
Limited testing scope
Only quantitative identity testing performed. No purity, heavy metals, microbial, endotoxin, sterility, or residual solvent testing reported on this document.
Batch number present
Batch/lot number clearly stated: 01DIHTESO BPC25
Known testing laboratory
JANOSHIK is a recognized third-party testing laboratory in the peptide/research compound space. Verification URL and unique key provided.
Unusual multi-compound blend report
This appears to be a test report for a blend/mixture of three different compounds (Dihexa, Tesofensine, BPC-157) with triplicate mass measurements. Format is atypical for standard peptide COAs which usually report single compounds with purity percentages.
Timing & next steps
Practical follow-ups based on document age and gaps.
coa age
This COA was issued over a year ago (416 days) — consider whether a retest is warranted for this batch.
PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.