Public COA audit
CJC-1295 (mod GRF 1-29) · CJC-1295 with no dac
Audited September 5, 2026
Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.
- Legitimacy
- 72
- Confidence
- 85%
- Panels
- 1/7
- Purity (printed)
- 99.43%
Scored moderately because the document is mostly consistent but carries soft concerns, limited panel coverage (1/7), 2 soft concerns, and notable note: "High purity reported". To improve: include identity, purity, and endotoxin at minimum.
Document details
Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.
- Batch / lot
- CND10N070125
- Sample date
- 2025-07-11
- Issue date
- 2025-07-15
Original certificate
Embedded copy of the stored COA PDF or image. Download it for your records — PeptIQ’s audit is separate from the lab document itself.
7-panel checklist
Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
1 of 7 present · 0 passed · 0 failed · 1 reported · 6 missing
Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.
Identity
Not on this certificate file · core
Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Purity
Tested · result on file · core
Reported purity percentage for the analyte.
99.334%; 99.422%; 99.532%
Heavy metals
Not on this certificate file
Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Microbial
Not on this certificate file
Bioburden / microbial limits testing.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Endotoxin
Not on this certificate file · core
LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Sterility
Not on this certificate file
Sterility testing where applicable.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Residual solvent / water
Not on this certificate file
Residual solvents or water content limits.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
How to read this
Had data · good
Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).
Had data · bad
Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.
Had data · unclear
Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.
Missing on this file
Not on this certificate file. Lowers file thoroughness; a sibling endotoxin/purity report for the same lot may still exist. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
Findings
Evidence-linked observations from this audit.
High purity reported
Three measurements averaging 99.43% purity. High purity is normal for research peptides and not inherently suspicious.
No identity confirmation method stated
Report shows purity testing but does not explicitly state identity confirmation method (e.g., mass spectrometry). This is a common limitation of purity-focused reports.
Limited testing scope
This report appears to be purity-focused only. No endotoxin, heavy metals, microbial, sterility, or residual solvent testing is shown on this page. This may be a split report where other safety panels are documented separately.
Known testing laboratory
Janoshik Analytical is a recognized third-party peptide testing laboratory in the research community.
Verification system provided
Document includes verification URL (www.janoshik.com/verify/) and unique key (F67MZD52SP4L) for independent verification.
Dates are consistent and valid
Testing ordered 2025-07-07, sample received 2025-07-11, analysis conducted 2025-07-15. Timeline is logical and all dates are in the past relative to 2026-09-05.
Batch number present
Batch CND10N070125 is clearly stated.
Professional presentation
Document has consistent branding, clear layout, QR code, and signature. Formatting is consistent with legitimate lab reports.
Timing & next steps
Practical follow-ups based on document age and gaps.
coa age
This COA was issued over a year ago (417 days) — consider whether a retest is warranted for this batch.
PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.