Public COA audit
BPC-157 · TB-500
Audited September 5, 2026
Missing panels or key metadata — not enough evidence to treat this as a full certificate.
- Legitimacy
- 45
- Confidence
- 75%
- Panels
- 0/7
Scored poorly because the file is incomplete or not a full COA, limited panel coverage (0/7), 3 critical findings, and notable note: "No analytical panels present". To improve: upload the full certificate (or the matching sibling purity/endotoxin report) and include identity, purity, and endotoxin at minimum.
Document details
Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.
- Batch / lot
- TBB20N061325
- Sample date
- 2025-06-23
- Issue date
- 2025-06-25
Original certificate
Embedded copy of the stored COA PDF or image. Download it for your records — PeptIQ’s audit is separate from the lab document itself.
7-panel checklist
Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
0 of 7 present · 0 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 7 missing
Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.
Identity
Not on this certificate file · core
Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Purity
Not on this certificate file · core
Reported purity percentage for the analyte.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Heavy metals
Not on this certificate file
Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Microbial
Not on this certificate file
Bioburden / microbial limits testing.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Endotoxin
Not on this certificate file · core
LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Sterility
Not on this certificate file
Sterility testing where applicable.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Residual solvent / water
Not on this certificate file
Residual solvents or water content limits.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
How to read this
Had data · good
Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).
Had data · bad
Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.
Had data · unclear
Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.
Missing on this file
Not on this certificate file. Lowers file thoroughness; a sibling endotoxin/purity report for the same lot may still exist. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
Findings
Evidence-linked observations from this audit.
No analytical panels present
This report only shows mass measurements (mg) for two compounds but provides no purity, identity confirmation, or safety testing data. It appears to be a simple quantification/fill report rather than a full COA.
No purity data
No HPLC, MS, or other purity analysis is reported. Only mass quantities are listed.
No identity confirmation
No MS, NMR, or other identity verification method is documented.
Known testing lab
Janoshik is a recognized peptide testing laboratory with verification system.
Batch number present
Batch TBB20N061325 is clearly documented.
Dates present and valid
Testing ordered 2025-06-19, sample received 2025-06-23, analysis conducted 2025-06-25. All dates are sequential and valid.
Limited scope report
This appears to be a quantification-only report (mass assessment of vials) rather than a comprehensive COA with quality/purity/safety testing.
Timing & next steps
Practical follow-ups based on document age and gaps.
coa age
This COA was issued over a year ago (437 days) — consider whether a retest is warranted for this batch.
PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.