Public COA audit

CJC-1295 (mod GRF 1-29) · Ipamorelin

Audited July 29, 2026

Incomplete documentation

Missing panels or key metadata — not enough evidence to treat this as a full certificate.

Legitimacy
45
Confidence
72%
Panels
0/7

Document details

Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.

Batch / lot
CNI10N062525
Sample date
2025-07-11
Issue date
2025-07-15

7-panel checklist

Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

0 of 7 present · 0 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 7 missing

Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.

  • Identity

    Not on this COA · core

    Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Purity

    Not on this COA · core

    Reported purity percentage for the analyte.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Heavy metals

    Not on this COA

    Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Microbial

    Not on this COA

    Bioburden / microbial limits testing.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Endotoxin

    Not on this COA · core

    LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Sterility

    Not on this COA

    Sterility testing where applicable.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Residual solvent / water

    Not on this COA

    Residual solvents or water content limits.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

How to read this

Had data · good

Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).

Had data · bad

Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.

Had data · unclear

Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.

Missing

Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

Findings

Evidence-linked observations from this audit.

  • No analytical panels present

    Document only shows quantitative mass measurements (6.25 mg, 5.47 mg, 6.24 mg for CJC-1295 and 6.10 mg, 5.32 mg, 6.10 mg for Ipamorelin) but provides no identity confirmation, purity analysis, or safety testing results. This is a mass assessment report, not a comprehensive COA.

  • No purity data

    No HPLC, MS, or other purity analysis results are provided. Only mass measurements of vial contents are shown.

  • No identity confirmation

    No mass spectrometry, amino acid analysis, or other identity confirmation method is documented.

  • Known testing laboratory

    Janoshik Analytical is a recognized peptide testing laboratory with verification system at www.janoshik.com/verify/

  • Batch number present

    Batch CNI10N062525 is clearly documented

  • Dates are reasonable

    Testing ordered 07 JUL 2025, sample received 11 JUL 2025, analysis conducted 15 JUL 2025 - all dates are sequential and within normal timeframes

  • Limited scope document

    This appears to be a mass assessment/quantification report rather than a full Certificate of Analysis. The test requested was 'Assessment of a peptide vial or vials' which explains the limited scope, but this does not meet typical COA standards for research peptides.

Timing & next steps

Practical follow-ups based on document age and gaps.

  • coa age

    This COA was issued over a year ago (379 days) — consider whether a retest is warranted for this batch.

PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.