Public COA audit
Pinealon
Audited July 28, 2026
Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.
- Legitimacy
- 88
- Confidence
- 92%
- Panels
- 2/7
- Purity (printed)
- 99.6%
Document details
Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.
- Batch / lot
- PN-02Q2626
- Identity method
- FTIR and HPLC
- Sample date
- 2026-07-10
- Issue date
- 2026-07-14
7-panel checklist
Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
2 of 7 present · 2 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 5 missing
Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.
Identity
Tested · passed · core
Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).
FTIR sampling spectrum confirms the presence of Pinealon with addition of excipient(s)/fillers
Purity
Tested · passed · core
Reported purity percentage for the analyte.
99.6%
Heavy metals
Not on this COA
Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Microbial
Not on this COA
Bioburden / microbial limits testing.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Endotoxin
Not on this COA · core
LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Sterility
Not on this COA
Sterility testing where applicable.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Residual solvent / water
Not on this COA
Residual solvents or water content limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
How to read this
Had data · good
Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).
Had data · bad
Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.
Had data · unclear
Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.
Missing
Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
Findings
Evidence-linked observations from this audit.
High purity confirmed
HPLC purity of 99.6% meets specification (≥98%) and is typical for research-grade peptides
Dual identity confirmation
Both FTIR and HPLC methods used for identity verification per USP standards
Complete batch information
Lot number PN-02Q2626 and BT Sample ID 005000040866315 provided
Recent testing dates
Sample tested 2026-07-10, report issued 2026-07-14 (4-day turnaround)
Lab identification present
BTLabs with full contact information, address (5730 Corporate Way, Suite 220, West Palm Beach, FL 33407), phone, email, and website provided
Limited testing scope
COA only includes identity and purity testing. No heavy metals, microbial, endotoxin, sterility, or residual solvent testing performed. This is common for basic research-grade peptide testing but limits safety assurance.
Professional presentation
Document includes QR code, report number (IF-824-QSA-TR006-BTL26052-01), dual signatures, and standard COA formatting
Peptide-to-excipients ratio documented
Ratio of 10.2:48.6 mg (1:4.8) provided, indicating transparency about formulation composition
PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.