Public COA audit
Oxytocin
Audited July 28, 2026
Missing panels or key metadata — not enough evidence to treat this as a full certificate.
- Legitimacy
- 35
- Confidence
- 88%
- Panels
- 0/7
Document details
Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.
- Batch / lot
- N260710-002
- Issue date
- 2026-07-17
7-panel checklist
Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
0 of 7 present · 0 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 7 missing
Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.
Identity
Not on this COA · core
Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Purity
Not on this COA · core
Reported purity percentage for the analyte.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Heavy metals
Not on this COA
Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Microbial
Not on this COA
Bioburden / microbial limits testing.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Endotoxin
Not on this COA · core
LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Sterility
Not on this COA
Sterility testing where applicable.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Residual solvent / water
Not on this COA
Residual solvents or water content limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
How to read this
Had data · good
Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).
Had data · bad
Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.
Had data · unclear
Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.
Missing
Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
Findings
Evidence-linked observations from this audit.
No purity analysis reported
COA contains only an assay (quantity) test showing 2.1 mg/bottle vs 2 mg/bottle specification. No HPLC purity percentage, no chromatogram, no identity confirmation tests are present.
No identity confirmation
No mass spectrometry, amino acid analysis, or other identity verification method is documented. Cannot confirm the material is actually Oxytocin.
Minimal testing scope
Only a single quantitative assay test is reported. No purity, heavy metals, microbial, endotoxin, sterility, or residual solvent/water panels are present. This is insufficient for peptide quality control.
No sample/test date
Document shows issue date 2026-07-17 but no sample collection date or test completion date is provided.
Cannot verify lab accreditation
Qalitex Inc. claims ISO/IEC 17025:2017 accreditation (AGS-US050824-1) but no verification URL or QR code link is provided. Lab name and accreditation body cannot be independently verified from this document.
Page 2 is blank
Second page contains only header/footer and a statement about electronic validity, but no additional test data. Unusual for a 2-page COA to have substantive content only on page 1.
PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.