Public COA audit
NAD+
Audited September 5, 2026
Multiple signals on this document conflict with known lab formats or verification patterns.
- Legitimacy
- 15
- Confidence
- 92%
- Panels
- 2/7
- Purity (printed)
- 99.895%
Scored poorly because audit signals point to fabrication or reused paperwork, limited panel coverage (2/7), 3 critical findings, and notable note: "Lab verification failed". To improve: replace this file with an original lab certificate that verifies on the lab portal and include identity, purity, and endotoxin at minimum.
Document details
Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.
- Batch / lot
- 665394
- Identity method
- HPLC with UV Detection Coupled with Mass Spectrometry
- Sample date
- 2026-04-06
- Issue date
- 2026-04-07
Original certificate
Embedded copy of the stored COA PDF or image. Download it for your records — PeptIQ’s audit is separate from the lab document itself.
7-panel checklist
Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
2 of 7 present · 2 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 5 missing
Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.
Identity
Tested · passed · core
Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).
NAD+ confirmed via mass spectrometry ([M+H]+ 664.05, [M+2H]2+ 332.45)
Purity
Tested · passed · core
Reported purity percentage for the analyte.
99.895%
Heavy metals
Not on this certificate file
Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Microbial
Not on this certificate file
Bioburden / microbial limits testing.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Endotoxin
Not on this certificate file · core
LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Sterility
Not on this certificate file
Sterility testing where applicable.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Residual solvent / water
Not on this certificate file
Residual solvents or water content limits.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
How to read this
Had data · good
Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).
Had data · bad
Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.
Had data · unclear
Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.
Missing on this file
Not on this certificate file. Lowers file thoroughness; a sibling endotoxin/purity report for the same lot may still exist. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
Findings
Evidence-linked observations from this audit.
Lab verification failed
Freedom Diagnostics and FreedomDiagnosticsTesting.com do not appear to be established analytical testing laboratories. No verifiable online presence, accreditation information, or independent references found for this entity as a peptide/compound testing facility.
Non-professional document design
Document uses generic template design with placeholder text ('No Photo Requested', 'TEST' repeated multiple times), inconsistent formatting, and lacks standard laboratory report elements such as method validation references, analyst credentials, QC data, or accreditation logos (ISO 17025, etc.).
Missing laboratory credentials
No laboratory accreditation information, certification numbers, or regulatory compliance statements. Legitimate analytical labs typically display ISO 17025, GMP, or similar credentials.
Limited testing scope
Only identity and purity panels present. No heavy metals, microbial, endotoxin, sterility, or residual solvent testing. While not automatically disqualifying, this is a minimal testing panel for research-grade materials.
Mass spec data presentation
Mass spectrum shows expected NAD+ ions ([M+H]+ 664.05, [M+2H]2+ 332.45) but lacks detailed method parameters, instrument specifications, or calibration information typical of professional analytical reports.
Client name anomaly
Client listed as 'Blank Peptides' with search code 'Blan2604060222' - appears to be placeholder or template text rather than actual client information.
Signature authenticity unclear
Signature appears to be a stylized font ('Alex Johnson') rather than an actual handwritten signature, reducing document authenticity.
Dates within acceptable range
Received 2026-04-06, reported 2026-04-07 (1-day turnaround). Both dates are before today (2026-09-05) and represent rapid but plausible turnaround for HPLC/MS analysis.
PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.