Public COA audit

NAD+ · Nicotinamide Adenine Dinucleotide

Audited July 29, 2026

Mostly consistent, with concerns

Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.

Legitimacy
72
Confidence
83%
Panels
2/7

Document details

Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.

Batch / lot
APR-5787466
Identity method
UPLC, Mass Spectrometry (MS)
Sample date
2026-03-17
Issue date
2026-03-22

7-panel checklist

Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

2 of 7 present · 1 passed · 0 failed · 1 reported · 5 missing

Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.

  • Identity

    Tested · passed · core

    Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).

    Confirmed by UPLC and MS

  • Purity

    Tested · result on file · core

    Reported purity percentage for the analyte.

    Not explicitly stated, chromatogram shows major peak

  • Heavy metals

    Not on this COA

    Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Microbial

    Not on this COA

    Bioburden / microbial limits testing.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Endotoxin

    Not on this COA · core

    LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Sterility

    Not on this COA

    Sterility testing where applicable.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Residual solvent / water

    Not on this COA

    Residual solvents or water content limits.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

How to read this

Had data · good

Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).

Had data · bad

Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.

Had data · unclear

Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.

Missing

Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

Findings

Evidence-linked observations from this audit.

  • Purity percentage not stated

    The COA shows UPLC chromatograms with a dominant peak but does not provide an explicit numerical purity percentage value, which is standard practice for research peptide/compound COAs.

  • Identity confirmed by dual methods

    Both UPLC retention time and mass spectrometry data are provided, showing molecular ion peaks consistent with NAD+ (MW ~663 Da based on MS2 peak at 662.16).

  • Batch/lot number present

    Lot Number APR-5787466 clearly stated.

  • Dates are reasonable and consistent

    Received Date: 03/17/2026, Analysis Conducted: 03/22/2026. Both dates are before today (2026-07-29) and show a logical 5-day turnaround.

  • Lab verification not independently confirmed

    Horizon Analytical is stated with a verification URL (horizonanalytical.com), but independent verification of this lab's existence and accreditation was not performed. The document appears professionally formatted.

  • Limited testing panels

    Only identity and purity (chromatographic) testing performed. No heavy metals, microbial, endotoxin, sterility, or residual solvent testing. This is not uncommon for basic identity/purity COAs but limits comprehensive quality assurance.

  • Professional presentation

    Document has consistent branding, clear chromatograms, mass spectrometry data, and contact information. Layout appears professional and typical of analytical lab reports.

PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.