Public COA audit
NAD+ · Nicotinamide Adenine Dinucleotide
Audited July 29, 2026
Missing panels or key metadata — not enough evidence to treat this as a full certificate.
- Legitimacy
- 45
- Confidence
- 75%
- Panels
- 1/7
Document details
Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.
- Batch / lot
- APR-6690114
- Sample date
- 2026-03-12
- Issue date
- 2026-03-14
7-panel checklist
Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
1 of 7 present · 1 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 6 missing
Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.
Identity
Not on this COA · core
Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Purity
Not on this COA · core
Reported purity percentage for the analyte.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Heavy metals
Not on this COA
Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Microbial
Not on this COA
Bioburden / microbial limits testing.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Endotoxin
Tested · passed · core
LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.
<0.05 EU/mL
Sterility
Not on this COA
Sterility testing where applicable.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Residual solvent / water
Not on this COA
Residual solvents or water content limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
How to read this
Had data · good
Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).
Had data · bad
Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.
Had data · unclear
Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.
Missing
Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
Findings
Evidence-linked observations from this audit.
Purity testing absent
No HPLC or other purity analysis is reported on this COA. For research peptides/compounds, purity determination is a fundamental requirement.
Identity confirmation absent
No identity verification method (MS, NMR, etc.) or result is documented. Cannot confirm the compound is actually NAD+.
Limited testing scope
Only endotoxin testing is present. Missing identity, purity, heavy metals, microbial, sterility, and residual solvent/water panels. This is an unusually narrow scope for a complete COA.
Batch/lot number present
Lot number APR-6690114 is clearly stated and matches across document fields.
Dates present and valid
Received date 2026-03-12 and analysis conducted date 2026-03-14 are both present and chronologically consistent. Both dates are before today (2026-07-29).
Lab verification unclear
Horizon Analytical is named with contact email and website (horizonanalytical.com), but independent verification of this lab's accreditation or reputation is not provided on the document itself.
Professional presentation
Document has clean formatting, logo, QR code for validation, signatory (Aleksey Yevtodiyenko PhD), and standard COA structure.
PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.