Public COA audit

NAD+ · Nicotinamide Adenine Dinucleotide

Audited September 5, 2026

Incomplete documentation

Missing panels or key metadata — not enough evidence to treat this as a full certificate.

Legitimacy
62
Confidence
78%
Panels
1/7

Scored lower because the file is incomplete or not a full COA, limited panel coverage (1/7), 1 critical finding, and notable note: "Identity testing performed". To improve: upload the full certificate (or the matching sibling purity/endotoxin report) and include identity, purity, and endotoxin at minimum.

Document details

Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.

Batch / lot
APR-6690114
Identity method
UPLC, Mass Spectrometry (MS)
Sample date
2026-03-12
Issue date
2026-03-15

Original certificate

Embedded copy of the stored COA PDF or image. Download it for your records — PeptIQ’s audit is separate from the lab document itself.

Loading original certificate…

7-panel checklist

Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

1 of 7 present · 0 passed · 0 failed · 1 reported · 6 missing

Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.

  • Identity

    Tested · result on file · core

    Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).

    MS2 ES+ m/z 662.37 (major peak)

  • Purity

    Not on this certificate file · core

    Reported purity percentage for the analyte.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

  • Heavy metals

    Not on this certificate file

    Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

  • Microbial

    Not on this certificate file

    Bioburden / microbial limits testing.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

  • Endotoxin

    Not on this certificate file · core

    LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

  • Sterility

    Not on this certificate file

    Sterility testing where applicable.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

  • Residual solvent / water

    Not on this certificate file

    Residual solvents or water content limits.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

How to read this

Had data · good

Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).

Had data · bad

Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.

Had data · unclear

Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.

Missing on this file

Not on this certificate file. Lowers file thoroughness; a sibling endotoxin/purity report for the same lot may still exist. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

Findings

Evidence-linked observations from this audit.

  • Identity testing performed

    UPLC and MS data provided showing mass spectrometry peaks consistent with NAD+ (m/z 662.37 major peak). Chromatograms appear technically plausible.

  • No quantitative purity reported

    This COA shows chromatography and mass spec data but does not state a purity percentage or area-under-curve analysis. Identity is demonstrated but purity quantification is absent.

  • Purity/identity report file

    This certificate file looks like a purity/identity report. Many vendors publish a separate endotoxin report for the same lot — missing endotoxin on this file alone does not prove the lot was never tested.

  • Lot number present

    Lot APR-6690114 clearly stated.

  • Dates present and valid

    Received 2026-03-12, Analysis Conducted 2026-03-15. Both dates are in the past relative to today (2026-09-05) and logically sequenced.

  • Lab identified with contact info

    Horizon Analytical with contact email and searchable URL provided. Lab claims USA operation.

  • Professional presentation

    Document has clean branding, proper headers, and technical chromatogram/MS data consistent with analytical lab output.

PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.