Public COA audit
NAD+ · Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide
Audited September 5, 2026
Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.
- Legitimacy
- 92
- Confidence
- 93%
- Panels
- 2/7
- Purity (printed)
- 99.45%
Scored high because the document is mostly consistent but carries soft concerns, limited panel coverage (2/7), and 1 soft concern. To improve: include identity, purity, and endotoxin at minimum.
Document details
Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.
- Batch / lot
- APR-5787466
- Identity method
- UPLC/MS (Ultra High Performance Liquid Chromatography with Mass Spectrometry)
- Sample date
- 2026-03-17
- Issue date
- 2026-03-22
Original certificate
Embedded copy of the stored COA PDF or image. Download it for your records — PeptIQ’s audit is separate from the lab document itself.
7-panel checklist
Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
2 of 7 present · 2 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 5 missing
Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.
Identity
Tested · passed · core
Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).
NAD+ confirmed by MS, molecular weight ~663.43 g/mol, CAS 53-84-9
Purity
Tested · passed · core
Reported purity percentage for the analyte.
99.45%
Heavy metals
Not on this certificate file
Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Microbial
Not on this certificate file
Bioburden / microbial limits testing.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Endotoxin
Not on this certificate file · core
LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Sterility
Not on this certificate file
Sterility testing where applicable.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Residual solvent / water
Not on this certificate file
Residual solvents or water content limits.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
How to read this
Had data · good
Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).
Had data · bad
Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.
Had data · unclear
Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.
Missing on this file
Not on this certificate file. Lowers file thoroughness; a sibling endotoxin/purity report for the same lot may still exist. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
Findings
Evidence-linked observations from this audit.
High purity confirmed
99.45% purity by UPLC is excellent for research-grade NAD+ and is within normal range for peptide/compound analysis
Identity confirmed by orthogonal methods
Both UPLC retention time and MS molecular weight confirmation (expected ~663.43 g/mol matches formula C21H27N7O14P2)
Clear lot traceability
Lot number APR-5787466 clearly stated, matches client name American peptide research
Dates are reasonable and consistent
Received 2026-03-17, analyzed 2026-03-22 (5-day turnaround is normal for analytical testing)
Professional presentation with verification
Horizon Analytical provides QR code for validation, contact information, and analyst signature (Aleksey Yevtodiyenko PhD)
Purity/identity report file
This certificate file looks like a purity/identity report. Many vendors publish a separate endotoxin report for the same lot — missing endotoxin on this file alone does not prove the lot was never tested.
Professional formatting with supporting data
Includes UPLC chromatogram and MS spectrum as supporting evidence, PubChem CID reference, and clear specification vs result comparison
PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.