Public COA audit

NAD+

Audited July 28, 2026

Mostly consistent, with concerns

Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.

Legitimacy
92
Confidence
88%
Panels
5/7
Purity (printed)
99.22%

Document details

Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.

Batch / lot
CR-NAD-1000MG-2605-2
Identity method
HPLC-RTM (retention time match)
Sample date
2026-05-22
Issue date
2026-06-01

7-panel checklist

Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

5 of 7 present · 4 passed · 0 failed · 1 reported · 2 missing

Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.

  • Identity

    Tested · passed · core

    Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).

    Confirmed

  • Purity

    Tested · passed · core

    Reported purity percentage for the analyte.

    99.22%

  • Heavy metals

    Tested · passed

    Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.

    All Not Detected (As, Cd, Cr, Hg, Pb)

  • Microbial

    Not on this COA

    Bioburden / microbial limits testing.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Endotoxin

    Tested · result on file · core

    LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.

    NMT 0.05 EU/mL

  • Sterility

    Tested · passed

    Sterility testing where applicable.

    No Growth

  • Residual solvent / water

    Not on this COA

    Residual solvents or water content limits.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

How to read this

Had data · good

Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).

Had data · bad

Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.

Had data · unclear

Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.

Missing

Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

Findings

Evidence-linked observations from this audit.

  • High purity confirmed

    99.22% purity by HPLC with triplicate conformity testing (mean 99.15%, std dev 0.0624%). This is normal for research-grade NAD+ and is well-supported by the chromatogram and methodology.

  • Identity confirmed

    NAD+ confirmed by HPLC retention time match with reference standard.

  • Batch information complete

    Lot number CR-NAD-1000MG-2605-2, COA number COA-2026-9_RBYQ, Accession ACC-2026-3014 all clearly stated.

  • Dates consistent

    Sample received 2026-05-22, analyzed 2026-06-01, issued 2026-06-01. All dates are on or before 2026-07-28 and are logically consistent.

  • Lab credentials stated

    ILS Laboratories, San Diego, CA. ISO/IEC 17025 accreditation claimed. Verification URL and access code provided.

  • Comprehensive testing panel

    Full QC panel includes purity, identity, heavy metals, sterility, endotoxin, and fentanyl screening. Microbial and residual solvent panels not present, which is acceptable for this product type.

  • Lab verification not independently confirmed

    ILS Laboratories is stated with address and ISO/IEC 17025 accreditation, but I cannot independently verify the lab's existence or accreditation status from the document alone. The verification URL is provided but not tested.

  • Professional presentation

    Multi-page COA with consistent formatting, detailed methodology notes, chromatogram, conformity testing data, and signature. Layout is professional and comprehensive.

PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.