Public COA audit
MOTS-C
Audited July 29, 2026
Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.
- Legitimacy
- 72
- Confidence
- 85%
- Panels
- 1/7
Document details
Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.
- Batch / lot
- PPA-RL-MS40-R00227
- Sample date
- 2026-07-10
- Issue date
- 2026-07-15
7-panel checklist
Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
1 of 7 present · 1 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 6 missing
Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.
Identity
Not on this COA · core
Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Purity
Not on this COA · core
Reported purity percentage for the analyte.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Heavy metals
Not on this COA
Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Microbial
Not on this COA
Bioburden / microbial limits testing.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Endotoxin
Tested · passed · core
LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.
0.0243 EU/μg
Sterility
Not on this COA
Sterility testing where applicable.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Residual solvent / water
Not on this COA
Residual solvents or water content limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
How to read this
Had data · good
Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).
Had data · bad
Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.
Had data · unclear
Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.
Missing
Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
Findings
Evidence-linked observations from this audit.
Limited testing scope
COA only reports endotoxin testing and visual appearance. No identity confirmation (MS, HPLC), purity analysis, heavy metals, microbial, sterility, or residual solvent testing present. This is a very narrow analytical scope for a peptide product.
No purity data
No HPLC or other purity analysis reported. Cannot verify peptide purity or sequence identity.
No identity confirmation
No mass spectrometry, amino acid analysis, or other identity confirmation method reported. Cannot verify this is actually MOTS-C.
Professional presentation
Document has professional formatting with clear lab branding, detailed ENDOSAFE test record data including device serial numbers, cartridge information, and calibration codes.
Reasonable timeline
Sample received 2026-07-10, analyzed and issued 2026-07-15. Five-day turnaround is reasonable for endotoxin testing.
Batch information present
Lot number PPA-RL-MS40-R00227 clearly stated with manufacturer Peptaura-Retalux identified.
Detailed test metadata
ENDOSAFE test record includes comprehensive technical details: device ID 21141224, cartridge lot 2605541294, temperature 37.0C, method KX-122, spike recovery 58%, all suggesting authentic instrument output.
PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.