Public COA audit
MOTS-C · MS 40
Audited September 5, 2026
Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.
- Legitimacy
- 68
- Confidence
- 82%
- Panels
- 2/7
- Purity (printed)
- 99%
Scored lower because the document is mostly consistent but carries soft concerns, limited panel coverage (2/7), 4 soft concerns, and notable note: "High purity confirmed". To improve: include identity, purity, and endotoxin at minimum and prefer labs with a public verification portal.
Document details
Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.
- Batch / lot
- 100014383
- Identity method
- HPLC with linear gradient (H20 and Acetonitrile with 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid)
- Sample date
- 2026-05-04
- Issue date
- 2026-05-08
Original certificate
Embedded copy of the stored COA PDF or image. Download it for your records — PeptIQ’s audit is separate from the lab document itself.
7-panel checklist
Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
2 of 7 present · 2 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 5 missing
Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.
Identity
Tested · passed · core
Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).
39.49mg content confirmed by HPLC chromatogram comparison
Purity
Tested · passed · core
Reported purity percentage for the analyte.
99%
Heavy metals
Not on this certificate file
Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Microbial
Not on this certificate file
Bioburden / microbial limits testing.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Endotoxin
Not on this certificate file · core
LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Sterility
Not on this certificate file
Sterility testing where applicable.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Residual solvent / water
Not on this certificate file
Residual solvents or water content limits.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
How to read this
Had data · good
Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).
Had data · bad
Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.
Had data · unclear
Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.
Missing on this file
Not on this certificate file. Lowers file thoroughness; a sibling endotoxin/purity report for the same lot may still exist. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
Findings
Evidence-linked observations from this audit.
High purity confirmed
99% purity by HPLC is within normal range for research peptides
Identity confirmed by HPLC
Content of 39.49mg confirmed by chromatogram comparison with reference standard
Batch number present
Order number 100014383 serves as batch/lot identifier
Dates within valid range
Receive date 2026-04-30, start date 2026-05-04, end date 2026-05-08 are all on or before 2026-09-05
Lab verification limited
Analiza Białek sp. z o.o. (Poland) listed with contact details, but no verification URL or QR code provided for independent confirmation
Limited testing scope
Only purity and identity panels present. No heavy metals, microbial, endotoxin, sterility, or residual solvent/water testing shown on this report
Large watermark obscures content
MADSEN AKADEMIE watermark covers significant portions of the document, which is unusual for official COAs
Photo inclusion unusual
Inclusion of vial photo with barcode is uncommon for standard analytical COAs, though not necessarily indicative of fraud
PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.