Public COA audit
MOTS-c
Audited July 29, 2026
Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.
- Legitimacy
- 92
- Confidence
- 88%
- Panels
- 2/7
- Purity (printed)
- 99.2%
Document details
Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.
- Batch / lot
- PPA-WL-MS10-P00703
- Identity method
- R-HPLC (Analytical Standard, 36.4% Acetonitrile)
- Sample date
- 2026-07-13
- Issue date
- 2026-07-19
7-panel checklist
Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
2 of 7 present · 2 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 5 missing
Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.
Identity
Tested · passed · core
Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).
36.4% Acetonitrile
Purity
Tested · passed · core
Reported purity percentage for the analyte.
99.2%
Heavy metals
Not on this COA
Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Microbial
Not on this COA
Bioburden / microbial limits testing.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Endotoxin
Not on this COA · core
LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Sterility
Not on this COA
Sterility testing where applicable.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Residual solvent / water
Not on this COA
Residual solvents or water content limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
How to read this
Had data · good
Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).
Had data · bad
Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.
Had data · unclear
Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.
Missing
Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
Findings
Evidence-linked observations from this audit.
High purity confirmed
99.2% purity by R-HPLC is within normal range for research-grade peptides and meets specification (≥99%)
Identity confirmed by R-HPLC
Retention time matches analytical standard at 36.4% acetonitrile
Batch number present
PPA-WL-MS10-P00703
Dates are logical and current
Sample received 2026-07-13, analyzed 2026-07-18, issued 2026-07-19 - all dates are sequential and on or before 2026-07-29
Testing lab identified
Pacific Coast Biologics Inc with signatory Ramon Rochin, Senior Chemist
Limited testing scope
Only identity, purity, and quantification panels present. No heavy metals, microbial, endotoxin, sterility, or residual solvent testing reported
Professional presentation
Document includes company branding, chromatogram, molecular formula (C₁₀₁H₁₅₂N₂₈O₂₂S₂), molecular weight (2174.64 Da), and standard disclaimer language
PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.