Public COA audit

motsc · MOTS-c

Audited September 5, 2026

Mostly consistent, with concerns

Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.

Legitimacy
45
Confidence
85%
Panels
2/7

Scored poorly because the document is mostly consistent but carries soft concerns, limited panel coverage (2/7), 1 critical finding, and notable note: "Identity Test Failed". To improve: include identity, purity, and endotoxin at minimum.

Document details

Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.

Batch / lot
WPMS10P00043
Identity method
LC-MS
Sample date
2026-06-04
Issue date
2026-06-07

Original certificate

Embedded copy of the stored COA PDF or image. Download it for your records — PeptIQ’s audit is separate from the lab document itself.

Loading original certificate…

7-panel checklist

Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

2 of 7 present · 0 passed · 1 failed · 1 reported · 5 missing

Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.

  • Identity

    Tested · failed · core

    Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).

    No Analyte Detected

  • Purity

    Tested · result on file · core

    Reported purity percentage for the analyte.

    N/A

  • Heavy metals

    Not on this certificate file

    Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

  • Microbial

    Not on this certificate file

    Bioburden / microbial limits testing.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

  • Endotoxin

    Not on this certificate file · core

    LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

  • Sterility

    Not on this certificate file

    Sterility testing where applicable.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

  • Residual solvent / water

    Not on this certificate file

    Residual solvents or water content limits.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

How to read this

Had data · good

Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).

Had data · bad

Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.

Had data · unclear

Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.

Missing on this file

Not on this certificate file. Lowers file thoroughness; a sibling endotoxin/purity report for the same lot may still exist. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

Findings

Evidence-linked observations from this audit.

  • Identity Test Failed

    LC-MS identity test shows 'No Analyte Detected' and Identity field explicitly marked as 'Failed'. The sample did not contain the expected peptide (MOTS-c).

  • Purity Not Determined

    Purity (HPLC-UV) result is listed as N/A. No purity percentage was determined or reported.

  • Limited Testing Scope

    This COA only includes identity and purity panels. No heavy metals, microbial, endotoxin, sterility, or residual solvent testing is present. This is a purity/identity-scoped report only.

  • Batch Number Present

    Lot number WPMS10P00043 clearly documented with search code Pine2606040464.

  • Dates Valid

    Received 2026-06-04, Reported 2026-06-07. Both dates are valid and show reasonable 3-day turnaround.

  • Lab Verification Uncertain

    Freedom Diagnostics Testing appears to be a legitimate testing service, but the failed identity test raises questions about sample handling, labeling, or vendor accuracy.

  • Professional Presentation

    Document includes chromatogram, mass confirmation section, signature, and standard disclaimer language. Formatting appears consistent with legitimate testing lab reports.

PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.