Public COA audit
motsc · MOTS-c
Audited July 29, 2026
Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.
- Legitimacy
- 45
- Confidence
- 85%
- Panels
- 2/7
Document details
Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.
- Batch / lot
- WPMS10P00043
- Identity method
- LC-MS
- Sample date
- 2026-06-04
- Issue date
- 2026-06-07
7-panel checklist
Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
2 of 7 present · 0 passed · 1 failed · 1 reported · 5 missing
Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.
Identity
Tested · failed · core
Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).
No Analyte Detected
Purity
Tested · result on file · core
Reported purity percentage for the analyte.
N/A
Heavy metals
Not on this COA
Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Microbial
Not on this COA
Bioburden / microbial limits testing.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Endotoxin
Not on this COA · core
LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Sterility
Not on this COA
Sterility testing where applicable.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Residual solvent / water
Not on this COA
Residual solvents or water content limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
How to read this
Had data · good
Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).
Had data · bad
Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.
Had data · unclear
Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.
Missing
Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
Findings
Evidence-linked observations from this audit.
Identity Test Failed
LC-MS identity test shows 'No Analyte Detected' and Identity field explicitly states 'Failed'. This indicates the sample does not contain the expected peptide (MOTS-c) or contains no detectable peptide at all.
Purity Not Determined
HPLC-UV purity analysis returned N/A. Combined with failed identity, this suggests the sample could not be properly analyzed or contained insufficient/incorrect material.
Limited Testing Scope
Only identity and purity panels were attempted. No heavy metals, microbial, endotoxin, sterility, or residual solvent testing performed. This is common for basic peptide screening but limits comprehensive quality assessment.
Lab Verification Needed
Freedom Diagnostics Testing appears to be a legitimate testing service based on document formatting and methodology descriptions, but independent verification of accreditation status is recommended.
Professional Presentation
Document includes proper header, accession number, search code, chromatogram, mass spectrum, signature, and standard disclaimers consistent with legitimate testing laboratory reports.
Batch Information Present
Lot number WPMS10P00043 clearly stated with client name (Pine Peptides) and product description.
Reasonable Timeline
Sample received 2026-06-04, reported 2026-06-07 (3-day turnaround). Dates are consistent and within normal testing timeframes.
PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.