Public COA audit
MOTS-C
Audited September 5, 2026
Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.
- Legitimacy
- 92
- Confidence
- 93%
- Panels
- 5/7
- Purity (printed)
- 99.52%
Scored high because the document is mostly consistent but carries soft concerns, broad panel coverage (5/7), and 1 soft concern.
Document details
Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.
- Batch / lot
- CRMTS-10-2605-1
- Identity method
- HPLC-RTM (retention time match)
- Sample date
- 2026-05-27
- Issue date
- 2026-06-01
Original certificate
Embedded copy of the stored COA PDF or image. Download it for your records — PeptIQ’s audit is separate from the lab document itself.
7-panel checklist
Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
5 of 7 present · 5 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 2 missing
Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.
Identity
Tested · passed · core
Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).
Confirmed
Purity
Tested · passed · core
Reported purity percentage for the analyte.
99.52%
Heavy metals
Tested · passed
Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.
All Not Detected (As, Cd, Cr, Hg, Pb)
Microbial
Not on this certificate file
Bioburden / microbial limits testing.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Endotoxin
Tested · passed · core
LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.
NMT 0.05 EU/mL
Sterility
Tested · passed
Sterility testing where applicable.
No Growth
Residual solvent / water
Not on this certificate file
Residual solvents or water content limits.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
How to read this
Had data · good
Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).
Had data · bad
Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.
Had data · unclear
Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.
Missing on this file
Not on this certificate file. Lowers file thoroughness; a sibling endotoxin/purity report for the same lot may still exist. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
Findings
Evidence-linked observations from this audit.
Excellent purity with conformity testing
99.52% purity confirmed across 3 samples (mean 99.23%, std dev 0.35%), with full HPLC chromatogram and conformity data provided
Identity confirmed by HPLC retention time
MOTS-C confirmed via HPLC-RTM against reference standard
Complete batch identification
Lot CRMTS-10-2605-1, COA #COA-2026-QGDAVS, Accession #ACC-2026-3346
Dates are consistent and valid
Received 2026-05-27, analyzed and issued 2026-06-01 (both on or before today 2026-09-05)
ISO/IEC 17025 accredited lab with verification
ILS Laboratories, San Diego CA, ISO/IEC 17025 accredited, with QR code and online verification portal
Comprehensive testing panel
Includes purity/identity (HPLC), heavy metals (ICP-MS), endotoxin (USP <85>), sterility (PCR), and fentanyl screen
Microbial and residual solvent panels not present
No microbial contamination testing (e.g., TAMC/TYMC) or residual solvent/water content analysis shown in this report
Professional formatting and methodology notes
Well-structured 2-page report with detailed methodology section, conformity testing statistics, and clear pass/fail criteria
PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.