Public COA audit
KPV
Audited September 5, 2026
Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.
- Legitimacy
- 92
- Confidence
- 88%
- Panels
- 5/7
- Purity (printed)
- 99.36%
Scored high because the document is mostly consistent but carries soft concerns, broad panel coverage (5/7), and 1 soft concern.
Document details
Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.
- Batch / lot
- CRKPV-10-2604-1
- Identity method
- HPLC retention time comparison with reference standard
- Sample date
- 2026-04-17
- Issue date
- 2026-04-22
Original certificate
Embedded copy of the stored COA PDF or image. Download it for your records — PeptIQ’s audit is separate from the lab document itself.
7-panel checklist
Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
5 of 7 present · 5 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 2 missing
Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.
Identity
Tested · passed · core
Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).
Confirmed (KPV)
Purity
Tested · passed · core
Reported purity percentage for the analyte.
99.36%
Heavy metals
Tested · passed
Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.
All Not Detected (As, Cd, Cr, Hg, Pb)
Microbial
Not on this certificate file
Bioburden / microbial limits testing.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Endotoxin
Tested · passed · core
LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.
NMT 0.05 EU/mL
Sterility
Tested · passed
Sterility testing where applicable.
No Growth
Residual solvent / water
Not on this certificate file
Residual solvents or water content limits.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
How to read this
Had data · good
Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).
Had data · bad
Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.
Had data · unclear
Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.
Missing on this file
Not on this certificate file. Lowers file thoroughness; a sibling endotoxin/purity report for the same lot may still exist. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
Findings
Evidence-linked observations from this audit.
High purity confirmed
99.36% purity by HPLC with conformity testing showing tight batch consistency (mean 99.33%, std dev 0.0205%)
Identity confirmed
KPV confirmed by HPLC retention time comparison with reference standard across all three conformity samples
Comprehensive testing
Full QC panel includes purity, identity, sterility (PCR), endotoxin (USP <85>), and heavy metals (ICP-MS per USP <233>)
Batch information complete
Lot number CRKPV-10-2604-1, accession ACC-2026-0949, with conformity testing across 3 samples
Dates consistent
Received 04/17/2026, analyzed and issued 04/22/2026 (5-day turnaround)
Lab credentials present
ILS Laboratories claims ISO/IEC 17025 accreditation, provides verification URL and QR code
Microbial and residual solvent panels absent
No microbial contamination testing (beyond sterility PCR) or residual solvent/water content analysis shown
Professional presentation
Clean layout, HPLC chromatogram included, conformity testing data transparent, signed by lab director
PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.