Public COA audit

Tirzepatide

Audited July 29, 2026

Mostly consistent, with concerns

Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.

Legitimacy
72
Confidence
85%
Panels
2/7

Document details

Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.

Batch / lot
TZ202605
Sample date
2026-06-09
Issue date
2026-06-09

7-panel checklist

Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

2 of 7 present · 2 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 5 missing

Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.

  • Identity

    Not on this COA · core

    Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Purity

    Not on this COA · core

    Reported purity percentage for the analyte.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Heavy metals

    Not on this COA

    Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Microbial

    Tested · passed

    Bioburden / microbial limits testing.

    No Growth (Bacteria), Not Detected (Fungi/Yeast)

  • Endotoxin

    Not on this COA · core

    LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Sterility

    Tested · passed

    Sterility testing where applicable.

    No microbial growth detected

  • Residual solvent / water

    Not on this COA

    Residual solvents or water content limits.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

How to read this

Had data · good

Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).

Had data · bad

Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.

Had data · unclear

Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.

Missing

Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

Findings

Evidence-linked observations from this audit.

  • Limited scope - sterility only

    This is a single-panel sterility screening report, not a comprehensive COA. Missing identity confirmation, purity analysis, heavy metals, endotoxin, and residual solvent testing that are typically expected for peptide quality assurance.

  • Non-regulatory sterility method

    Document explicitly states this is a rapid screening method suitable for QC purposes, and notes that full USP <71> sterility testing may be required for regulatory compliance. This is a preliminary assessment, not a definitive sterility certification.

  • Batch information present

    Lot number TZ202605 clearly documented with sample matrix specified as lyophilized powder.

  • Same-day turnaround

    Sample received and certified on the same date (2026-06-09), which is plausible for a rapid 2-day screening method that may have been initiated prior to formal receipt documentation.

  • Lab verification not possible

    Kovera Labs is named as the testing facility, but no website URL, accreditation information, or independent verification method is provided beyond a QR code access code (EB005D).

  • Professional presentation

    Document has clean, professional formatting with clear sections, proper branding, and includes a photograph of the tested vial showing batch number consistency.

  • Incomplete for peptide COA standards

    While legitimate as a sterility screening report, this would be insufficient as a standalone Certificate of Analysis for a research peptide. Identity and purity testing are fundamental requirements missing from this document.

PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.