Public COA audit
Tesamorelin
Audited July 29, 2026
Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.
- Legitimacy
- 72
- Confidence
- 85%
- Panels
- 1/7
Document details
Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.
- Batch / lot
- TES202604
- Issue date
- 2026-04-22
7-panel checklist
Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
1 of 7 present · 1 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 6 missing
Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.
Identity
Not on this COA · core
Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Purity
Not on this COA · core
Reported purity percentage for the analyte.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Heavy metals
Tested · passed
Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.
Pb <0.6 ppm, As <0.17 ppm, Cd <0.04 ppm, Hg <0.5 ppm
Microbial
Not on this COA
Bioburden / microbial limits testing.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Endotoxin
Not on this COA · core
LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Sterility
Not on this COA
Sterility testing where applicable.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Residual solvent / water
Not on this COA
Residual solvents or water content limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
How to read this
Had data · good
Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).
Had data · bad
Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.
Had data · unclear
Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.
Missing
Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
Findings
Evidence-linked observations from this audit.
Heavy metals only panel
This COA contains only heavy metals analysis (ICP-MS). No identity confirmation (MS, NMR, HPLC), purity testing, or other standard peptide panels are present. This is a supplemental test report, not a complete COA.
Lab verification unclear
Kovera Labs is listed with verification URL koveralabs.com/verify and access code DA6A86. The lab name and URL format appear professional, but independent verification of the lab's existence and accreditation status is recommended.
Analysis date valid
Analysis date of April 22, 2026 is within acceptable range (before current date of July 29, 2026).
Batch number present
Lot/Batch TES202604 is clearly stated and follows logical naming convention (Tesamorelin, 2026, batch 04).
Heavy metals testing comprehensive
ICP-MS analysis includes all four critical heavy metals (Pb, As, Cd, Hg) with proper spike recovery validation (91-104% recovery, all within 70-150% criteria). Method blank, CCV, and duplicate RPD all pass QC.
Professional presentation
Document formatting is clean, consistent, and professional with proper headers, tables, QR code, and authorization signature.
PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.