Public COA audit

SS-31

Audited September 5, 2026

Mostly consistent, with concerns

Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.

Legitimacy
72
Confidence
88%
Panels
2/7

Scored moderately because the document is mostly consistent but carries soft concerns, limited panel coverage (2/7), 1 critical finding, and notable note: "Issue date precedes sample receipt". To improve: include identity, purity, and endotoxin at minimum and prefer labs with a public verification portal.

Document details

Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.

Batch / lot
SS202601
Sample date
2026-04-12
Issue date
2026-04-10

Original certificate

Embedded copy of the stored COA PDF or image. Download it for your records — PeptIQ’s audit is separate from the lab document itself.

Loading original certificate…

7-panel checklist

Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

2 of 7 present · 2 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 5 missing

Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.

  • Identity

    Not on this certificate file · core

    Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

  • Purity

    Not on this certificate file · core

    Reported purity percentage for the analyte.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

  • Heavy metals

    Not on this certificate file

    Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

  • Microbial

    Tested · passed

    Bioburden / microbial limits testing.

    No Growth (Bacteria), Not Detected (Fungi/Yeast)

  • Endotoxin

    Not on this certificate file · core

    LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

  • Sterility

    Tested · passed

    Sterility testing where applicable.

    No microbial growth detected

  • Residual solvent / water

    Not on this certificate file

    Residual solvents or water content limits.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

How to read this

Had data · good

Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).

Had data · bad

Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.

Had data · unclear

Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.

Missing on this file

Not on this certificate file. Lowers file thoroughness; a sibling endotoxin/purity report for the same lot may still exist. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

Findings

Evidence-linked observations from this audit.

  • Issue date precedes sample receipt

    Date Certified (04/10/2026) is 2 days before Date Received (04/12/2026). A lab cannot certify results before receiving the sample.

  • Sterility/microbial testing scope

    This is a sterility-focused report only. Sterility and microbial panels present and passed. Purity, identity, endotoxin, heavy metals, and residual solvent panels are not included in this report scope.

  • Lab verification not possible

    Kovera Labs is not a widely recognized third-party testing laboratory. No verification URL or contact information provided. QR code present but destination unknown.

  • Rapid screening method disclaimer

    Document explicitly states this is a rapid screening method for quality control purposes and notes that full USP <71> sterility testing may be required for regulatory compliance. This is a preliminary assessment, not a full sterility validation.

  • Batch information present

    Lot number SS202601 clearly stated and matches vial image.

PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.