Public COA audit
Semax
Audited July 29, 2026
Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.
- Legitimacy
- 72
- Confidence
- 88%
- Panels
- 1/7
Document details
Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.
- Batch / lot
- SX202603
- Issue date
- 2026-03-31
7-panel checklist
Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
1 of 7 present · 1 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 6 missing
Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.
Identity
Not on this COA · core
Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Purity
Not on this COA · core
Reported purity percentage for the analyte.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Heavy metals
Tested · passed
Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.
Pb <0.7 ppm, As <0.22 ppm, Cd <0.04 ppm, Hg <0.4 ppm
Microbial
Not on this COA
Bioburden / microbial limits testing.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Endotoxin
Not on this COA · core
LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Sterility
Not on this COA
Sterility testing where applicable.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Residual solvent / water
Not on this COA
Residual solvents or water content limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
How to read this
Had data · good
Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).
Had data · bad
Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.
Had data · unclear
Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.
Missing
Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
Findings
Evidence-linked observations from this audit.
Heavy metals only
This is a specialized heavy metals analysis report only. No identity confirmation (HPLC/MS) or purity testing is included. This is a supplemental test, not a complete COA.
Lab verification needed
Kovera Labs is stated with verification URL koveralabs.com/verify and sample ID KVR-2026-CAAD42 / Access Code B7EE01. Independent verification of lab existence and sample authenticity is recommended.
Analysis date valid
Analysis date March 31, 2026 is within acceptable range (on or before 2026-07-29).
Batch number present
Lot/Batch SX202603 clearly stated.
Heavy metals pass
All four tested elements (Pb, As, Cd, Hg) are below acceptance limits with proper spike recovery validation (102-104%, within 70-150% criteria). Method suitability confirmed.
Professional presentation
Document shows proper methodology disclosure, QC controls (method blank, CCV, duplicate RPD <6%), spike recovery data, and dual authorization signatures.
PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.