Public COA audit
Retatrutide
Audited July 29, 2026
Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.
- Legitimacy
- 72
- Confidence
- 85%
- Panels
- 2/7
Document details
Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.
- Batch / lot
- RTT2613
- Sample date
- 2026-06-30
- Issue date
- 2026-06-30
7-panel checklist
Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
2 of 7 present · 2 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 5 missing
Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.
Identity
Not on this COA · core
Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Purity
Not on this COA · core
Reported purity percentage for the analyte.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Heavy metals
Not on this COA
Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Microbial
Tested · passed
Bioburden / microbial limits testing.
No microbial growth detected
Endotoxin
Not on this COA · core
LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Sterility
Tested · passed
Sterility testing where applicable.
No microbial growth detected
Residual solvent / water
Not on this COA
Residual solvents or water content limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
How to read this
Had data · good
Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).
Had data · bad
Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.
Had data · unclear
Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.
Missing
Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
Findings
Evidence-linked observations from this audit.
Unverifiable lab identity
Kovera Labs is not a widely recognized third-party testing laboratory. No verification URL or contact information provided to confirm legitimacy.
Limited testing scope
This is a sterility-only report. No identity confirmation (HPLC/MS), purity analysis, heavy metals, or endotoxin testing included. A complete COA would typically include multiple analytical panels.
Same-day turnaround
Sample received and certified on the same day (06/30/2026) with only a 2-day rapid screening method. While technically possible for rapid tests, this is unusually fast for comprehensive quality assurance.
Professional presentation
Document has clean formatting, consistent branding, QR code for access, and clear test methodology description.
Sterility testing documented
Sterility screening shows clear pass results for bacteria (aerobic/anaerobic) and fungi/yeast with documented methodology and incubation parameters.
Batch information present
Lot number RTT2613 clearly documented with sample matrix (lyophilized powder) and compound name (Retatrutide).
Rapid screening disclaimer
Document explicitly states this is a preliminary screening method and that 'full compendial sterility testing may be required' for regulatory compliance, indicating this is not a complete sterility test.
PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.